Re: [pinhole-discussion] c-41 film

2002-08-22 Thread aaron
haven't used it, but i've heard that it uses dye, like color films, and so a grain won't show even with substantial enlarging. i've been wanting to shoot some as pinhole. /aaron > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 21:43:00 +0100 > Subject: Re: [pinhole-discu

Re: [pinhole-discussion] c-41 film

2002-08-20 Thread glehany
I use Ilford XP2 in my 35mm camera. I love it. I like it because it is versitile, usable from iso100 to 800 (and maybe beyond). Consequently it has a wide exposure latitude and can therefore retain detail in dark and light areas in very high contrast situations without altering development -

Re: [pinhole-discussion] c-41 film

2002-08-20 Thread BWPHOTO4527
I've used C-41 process black and white film for 35mm (mainly for street photography and informal portrait work). Although I have a roll of 120 slated for use in my Zero multiformat pinhole camera, I haven't had a chance to try it out yet. That being said, I've tried Ilford's XP2, Kodak's Portra

Re: [pinhole-discussion] c-41 film

2002-08-20 Thread Christian Harkness
Yes, yes, and yes! I take it you are talking about black & white chromogenic film, since all color negative film is C-41. Be aware that some Kodak C-41 B&W films are formulated to be printed on color paper, and you have a devil of a time printing them in a b&w darkroom. I recommend you start

[pinhole-discussion] c-41 film

2002-08-19 Thread allen waters
Any one use this? Any comments? Is it worth while? Many thanks.