Murray writes:
BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by anything
larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
pinhole images are not very sharp.
Actually, what they are telling you is that THEY will be disappointed by
anything larger than 5X7.
Murray writes:
BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by anything
larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
pinhole images are not very sharp.
Is this just anecdotal advice from people who simply poked a hole without
consideration of all
- Original Message -
From: Gordon J. Holtslander hol...@duke.usask.ca
You are more or less correct, as you enlarge your image from a pinhole
negative on 35 mm film you will be making the limited resolution of the
image more apparent.
If you want a really sharp 8x10 pinhole images the
Hi:
I _think_ this is what happens - knowledgeable people feel free to
correct me.
There are two things that limit the pinhole resolution:
I believe a pinhole image's - the negative - limit of resolution is the
size of the pinhole - The finest detail the image can create is the same
as the
@p at ???
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:49 PM
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] questions comments
Hello:
Excuse me if I already asked this - if I did, I forgot the replies already
(but I don't think I did).
Oh, firstly, apologies for the html forwarding garbage characters
Murray wrote
BUT, people are telling me I will probably be disappointed by
anything
larger than 5 x 7 or so from my 35 mm pinhole negatives because they say
pinhole images are not very sharp.
Murry,
My favorite pinhole camera is a large popcorn tin. It uses 11x14 photo
paper
Hello:
Excuse me if I already asked this - if I did, I forgot the replies already
(but I don't think I did).
Oh, firstly, apologies for the html forwarding garbage characters...I don't
think AOL software lets one too picky about how they do things.
I am a little confused, perhaps only by my
