Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-19 Thread Charles Sloan
The Indian Pot was colorized in Photoshop. Chuck Andy Schmitt wrote: Seems rather normal at lease under what ever lighting conditions you shot under... I like the WPHD picture of the Indian Pot. This is hand colored? andy -- 'Tearlach' ICQ: 32665989 My Home Page:

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-19 Thread Richard M. Koolish
Although it is a positive film, wouldn't that mean it is designed to be used with a reversal process? If you developed it in a regular film or paper developer, you would get a negative. John While most positive films do need reversal processing, there are some special direct positive

RE: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-19 Thread Andy Schmitt
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:11 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film Go to: http://www.chucksphotos.com/Gallery_pinhole.html It's the Image labeled 'Coworkers' in the second row of thumbnails. Sorry about the small

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-19 Thread Charles Sloan
I worked in an x-ray darkroom. The Duplication film was developed in the same processing machines and chemistry as the Positive film. Chuck John Yeo wrote: Although it is a positive film, wouldn't that mean it is designed to be used with a reversal process? If you developed it in a regular

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread John Yeo
at ??? Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 8:11 AM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film I almost bought some Agfa xray duplication film and my better judgement (when I can locate it) suggested I check the Agfa website, then I called a local xray tech, and figured out

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Richard Heather
For a large format pinhole photography a positive image may be a plus. You could exhibit with a backlight without further manipulation. Most non photographers can't visualize negatives though I often find the negatives much more beautiful than the positives. Richard Heather Murray wrote: I

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Charles Sloan
Go to: http://www.chucksphotos.com/Gallery_pinhole.html It's the Image labeled 'Coworkers' in the second row of thumbnails. Sorry about the small size. I didn't do any tests to determine what colors the x-ray film is sensitive to. Chuck Andy Schmitt wrote: hmmm cool...what kind of an

RE: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Andy Schmitt
-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film I can add something here. I used to work in an x-ray darkroom, where I made a pinhole camera out of an oatmeal box and used an 8x10 sheet of x-ray film. It worked fine under the Tungsten lights

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Charles Sloan
I can add something here. I used to work in an x-ray darkroom, where I made a pinhole camera out of an oatmeal box and used an 8x10 sheet of x-ray film. It worked fine under the Tungsten lights there in the hospital. I didn't try it outdoors, but I'm sure it'll work there too. Chuck Andy

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message - From: Andy Schmitt aschm...@warwick.net I bought some Kodak Contact 2000 film that requires other than Daylight or Tungsten enlarger light...pitty 'cause it was cheep...wonder why? Think I saw itwasn't Clinton Mandela the guy selling it?...may be not!

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Lisa Reddig
2) I will make this on-topic, I promise. Conservation of mass as it applies to pairs of domestic pets...one loses weight, the other one gains it. I have been wanting to do some cat pinhole shotsthe tail twitching and contortions they do might be interesting with long exposures. Hey Murray

RE: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film

2002-01-18 Thread Andy Schmitt
-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Murray Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 11:11 AM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film...xray duplication film I almost bought some Agfa xray duplication film and my better

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film?

2002-01-17 Thread Richard Heather
Yes this is slide film. I have my slide film (Velvia or Elite Chrome) sent to Kodak for development and Photo CD scanning. This has been slow, sometimes very inefficient and sometimes mediocre scans but on the whole their pro scanner is better than what I could buy and CD storage is relatively

Re: [pinhole-discussion] transparency film?

2002-01-17 Thread Howard Wells
Sorry for the confusion. Yes it is simply slide film. I tend to speak of it as transparency film when it is in sizes larger than 35mm--120, 4x5 etc. The 120 is sleeved uncut and the 4x5 is in a glassine envelope. Howard R Duarte wrote: sorry if this is a stupid question, but what do you do with

[pinhole-discussion] transparency film?

2002-01-17 Thread R Duarte
From: Howard Wells sandw...@earthlink.net ... I've always shot a lot of transparency film in various pinhole cameras, partially because I always have it around for non-pinhole purposes, and partially because of its beauty. Lately I've been using the 120 version of Fuji Provia 400F. A