Eric,
This sounds like a lens issue rather than a negative holder. I have seen more
than one D2 rigged up to 5x7, so I doubt that it is a negative covering
problem. If the mentioned glass sandwich you created does not project the
entire sheet of film, or clips the corners, may I ask what the
t: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers
Andy Schmitt writes:
> Digital is cool...until you see the image size for a good 4x5 scan..
8o)
Hey, media is (are?) cheap. And my Photoshop skills are orders of
magnitude better than whatever darkroom skills I may be said to posse
Andy Schmitt writes:
> Digital is cool...until you see the image size for a good 4x5 scan.. 8o)
Hey, media is (are?) cheap. And my Photoshop skills are orders of
magnitude better than whatever darkroom skills I may be said to possess.
--E
2 5:29 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers
Thanks for the tip, Andy, but I think you are missing my point.
Which is: the 4 x 5 enlargers I've used insist that 4 x 5 is the image
as framed in a negative carrier. Once you get away fro
Thanks for the tip, Andy, but I think you are missing my point.
Which is: the 4 x 5 enlargers I've used insist that 4 x 5 is the image
as framed in a negative carrier. Once you get away from the negative
carrier, and try to print the whole negative, you'll find that the
diameter of the circular h
inhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of Eric S. Theise
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:10 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers
D Hill writes:
> I'll second Len's advice o
- Original Message -
From: "Eric S. Theise"
> Are there any 4 x 5 enlargers that will handle the full negative or do I
> need to go to a larger size?
Yes, a 5x7 would do what you want. A cheap option, if you can find one, is an
old 5x7 Elwood
Guillermo
D Hill writes:
> I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more
> expensive than other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last
> enlarger you will ever buy.
Glad to see this thread; I have an enlarger-related question that I'm
sure can be answered by people on this list.
I Zarkov
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 9:10 AM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] used enlargers
I agreee totally about getting an Omega D series enlarger. I've had a D2V
for about 20 years now and it's still great. Just found a point source head
for i
I agreee totally about getting an Omega D series enlarger. I've had a D2V
for about 20 years now and it's still great. Just found a point source head
for it and will be printing electron microscope negatives. Extremely
versatile assortment of heads: cold light, condenser, color fits many needs,
In a message dated 5/22/02 11:05:50 PM Central Daylight Time,
zopp...@yahoo.com writes:
> am looking for a used enlarger. I looked on ebay and the good ones are
> going for around $400-$500. I wonder if anybody on this list has a favorite
> place to buy used reconditioned enlargers?
>
check
I'll second Len's advice on a used D2 - they may be a bit more expensive than
other used enlargers but it quite possibly is the last enlarger you will ever
buy.
Don
Leonard Peterson wrote: Shannon Stoney wrote:
I am looking for a used enlarger. I looked on ebay and the good ones are
going f
Shannon Stoney wrote:
I am looking for a used enlarger. I looked on ebay and the good ones are
going for around $400-$500. I wonder if anybody on this list has a favorite
place to buy used reconditioned enlargers?
Reply: I've been using an Omega D2 for years with a Zone VI cold light and
it'
13 matches
Mail list logo
