We are discussing this via a digital medium. To a certain extent, that
will force a certain amount of digital photography to be used.
Specifically, if we want to share our images with the hundreds (how many
current members are there? George?) of members of this list, the only
practical method
I use both digital and silver processing.
I find that it is far easier to get a 'slick' image with digital.
With digital it does not take long to produce a good image and then print
it. The creativity digital allows is very great indeed. With today's
technology and materials, archival
Good point, Andy! I guess that's what I was trying to convey, but I got all
wordy...!
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of andy schmitt
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:30 PM
To: pinhole
--- luish m. coelho lu...@ignore.com.br wrote:
..snip..
stimulating. I heard Kodak
wants to terminate film pelicula for the movies in
2005? It may not be
true, but think about the enviroment impact our
chemicals do).
My I'm talkative today.
Saw my first digital movie a few days ago --
--- I Zarkov dr_izar...@hotmail.com wrote:
..snip..
screens and software galore. Its too darn hard to
throw a sabot into the
CD-ROM drive.
Try putting a piece of sliced Bologna in your CD drive
-- probably a good sabot substitute!
- p
__
Lisa has expressed exactly my apprehensions about what I read here daily
about the marriage of the digital with the pinhole. I began doing pinhole 12
years ago because I was already at that point disgusted with the critical
discourse that was then emerging as to how digital imagery would
Lisa,
don't get me wrong. I may be a little excited about defending digital
processes, but I am also very much into 'traditional' pinhole.
what realy gets me into defending a more attention to what is happening
in the digital field is that pixels are a new way of magic (let's not be
naive and
