Re: [pinhole-discussion] Santa Barbara Cameras?

2001-02-15 Thread G.Penate
- Original Message - From: Richard Heather rheat...@slonet.org I have both a Leonardo and SB. The SB can be adapted to use graphlex 6x9 backs that wont fit in the Leo. The SB shutter stopper can be cumbersome or fall off. The dowels are too thick to use with a 4x5 film holder and the

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Santa Barbara Cameras?

2001-02-15 Thread Richard Heather
I have both a Leonardo and SB. The SB can be adapted to use graphlex 6x9 backs that wont fit in the Leo. The SB shutter stopper can be cumbersome or fall off. The dowels are too thick to use with a 4x5 film holder and the back. I use the cardboard tubes from my wife's tampax. Richard Heather

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Santa Barbara Cameras?

2001-02-15 Thread James Romeo
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Santa Barbara Cameras? Thats the one thing that I don't like about the SB cameras, the dowels can get lost. I'm always dropping at least one of them. As you know the Leonardo's film holders are attached to the camera. Pluse I

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Santa Barbara Cameras?

2001-02-14 Thread Tom Miller
Jeff, Stick with Leonardo. I own two of them (6 and 1.5) and one Santa Barbara (3). For the extra $10, its worth it, better construction and ease of use. The SB's wooden dowels that slide against the film holders are not attached. For fumblers like me, they fall in the snow or mud too