Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] pixman: Add support for aarch64 neon optimization (ver.3.1)

2016-04-18 Thread Mizuki Asakura
Sorry for your confusoin, but I thought the "tiny" patch should be sent before my completed (ver.4) patch to detect some regression could happen with a larger patch. If the patch (ver.4) is no problem, please ignore this (v3.1) patch. On 18 April 2016 at 18:58, Siarhei Siamashka

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH] pixman: Add support for aarch64 neon optimization (ver.3.1)

2016-04-18 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 22:20:24 +0900 Mizuki Asakura wrote: > Since aarch64 has different neon syntax from aarch32 and has no > support for (older) arm-simd, > there are no SIMD accelerations for pixman on aarch64. > > We need new implementations. > > This patch only contains

[Pixman] [PATCH] pixman: Add support for aarch64 neon optimization (ver.3.1)

2016-04-14 Thread Mizuki Asakura
Since aarch64 has different neon syntax from aarch32 and has no support for (older) arm-simd, there are no SIMD accelerations for pixman on aarch64. We need new implementations. This patch only contains FAST_PATH codes, not bilinear optimizations codes. After completing optimization this patch,