Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/1] pixman: Fixing endianness problems for powerpc archs

2015-05-26 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Mon, 25 May 2015 21:43:38 -0400 Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Also, Siarhei Siamashka mentioned it would be good if I demonstrated that it also does not affect ppc in 32-bit mode. I am not sure on how to do so. Any suggestions? It is possible to use the -m32

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/1] pixman: Fixing endianness problems for powerpc archs

2015-05-26 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
On 05/26/2015 06:13 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: I'm curious, what is this one test in master that fails on ppc64? And it really succeeds after your patch on ppc64le? That's right, I just ran make make check and got the same result. Could you provide the test log for that one? Below is the one

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/1] pixman: Fixing endianness problems for powerpc archs

2015-05-26 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
On 05/26/2015 09:46 AM, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote: Below is the one that failed on ppc64: I want to correct myself here. I was told today that I am running powerpc on 32-bit mode when using ppc BE on Debian. I just confused myself because uname -m returned ppc64. I apologize for the

[Pixman] [PATCH 0/1] pixman: Fixing endianness problems for powerpc archs

2015-05-25 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
Hello LG. I will detail prior and post patch for both ppc64le and ppc64 architectures, so I can indicate that my patch will not affect either negatively. That is because I just noticed that upstream version is now on version 0.33.1 and there are additional tests. v0.32.6 prior patch: ppc64le: 8