On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> Certainly we have many kids still using the XO 1.0.
> Our last version use Fedora 18 (and cairo 1.12)
> If there are a performance gain, would be useful for us,
> and there are volunteers making os images.
Does this mean that the Fedora 20
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Søren Sandmann
>> I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86
>> has been the XO 1 laptops, and I really doubt that they are getting updated
>> pixman libraries any more.
>
> Cc
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Søren Sandmann
wrote:
>
>> IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable
>> MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT?
I don't really see the benefit. The bugs we've had have all been
trivially fixed.
I'm conc
On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote:
> > IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable
> > MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT?
>
> I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86
> has been the
> IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable
> MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT?
I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86
has been the XO 1 laptops, and I really doubt that they are getting updated
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:26:21 -0700
> Matt Turner wrote:
>
>> Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago
>> for Loongson and other things using the MMX code.
>>
>> I've got a few more patches for the MMX code t
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:26:21 -0700
Matt Turner wrote:
> Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago
> for Loongson and other things using the MMX code.
>
> I've got a few more patches for the MMX code that I'll send out as I
> benchmark them.
>
> I don't really expect
Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago
for Loongson and other things using the MMX code.
I've got a few more patches for the MMX code that I'll send out as I
benchmark them.
I don't really expect any reviews, so barring objections I'll plan to
commit them in a few