Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-28 Thread Daniel Drake
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > Certainly we have many kids still using the XO 1.0. > Our last version use Fedora 18 (and cairo 1.12) > If there are a performance gain, would be useful for us, > and there are volunteers making os images. Does this mean that the Fedora 20

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-27 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Søren Sandmann >> I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86 >> has been the XO 1 laptops, and I really doubt that they are getting updated >> pixman libraries any more. > > Cc

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote: > >> IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable >> MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT? I don't really see the benefit. The bugs we've had have all been trivially fixed. I'm conc

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-26 Thread Jeff Muizelaar
On Sep 23, 2014, at 3:24 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote: > > IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable > > MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT? > > I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86 > has been the

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-23 Thread Søren Sandmann
> IIRC, we have already discussed it before. Maybe we should just disable > MMX support for x86 and use it only for MIPS Loongson and ARM IWMMXT? I'd be in favor of that. For a long time the only real use case for MMX/x86 has been the XO 1 laptops, and I really doubt that they are getting updated

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:26:21 -0700 > Matt Turner wrote: > >> Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago >> for Loongson and other things using the MMX code. >> >> I've got a few more patches for the MMX code t

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-21 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 00:26:21 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago > for Loongson and other things using the MMX code. > > I've got a few more patches for the MMX code that I'll send out as I > benchmark them. > > I don't really expect

[Pixman] [PATCH 0/2] mmx nearest scaling paths

2014-09-05 Thread Matt Turner
Here are a couple of nearest scaling MMX paths I wrote a long time ago for Loongson and other things using the MMX code. I've got a few more patches for the MMX code that I'll send out as I benchmark them. I don't really expect any reviews, so barring objections I'll plan to commit them in a few