Quoting Matt Turner (2019-01-22 00:49:39)
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:27 AM Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Raghuveer Devulapalli (2019-01-17 00:59:59)
> > > From: raghuveer devulapalli
> > >
> > > These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations in
> > > the future.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 4:57 PM Raghuveer Devulapalli
wrote:
>
> From: raghuveer devulapalli
>
> These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations in
> the future.
> ---
> pixman/pixman-sse2.c | 504 +--
> pixman/pixman-sse2.h | 502 +++
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:27 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Quoting Raghuveer Devulapalli (2019-01-17 00:59:59)
> > From: raghuveer devulapalli
> >
> > These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations in
> > the future.
>
> Are we ever going to run into a naming conflict in the
: Devulapalli, Raghuveer
Subject: Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 2/3] Moving helper functions in pixman-sse2.c to
pixman-sse2.h.
Quoting Raghuveer Devulapalli (2019-01-17 00:59:59)
> From: raghuveer devulapalli
>
> These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations
> i
Quoting Raghuveer Devulapalli (2019-01-17 00:59:59)
> From: raghuveer devulapalli
>
> These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations in
> the future.
Are we ever going to run into a naming conflict in the future? Is it
worth prefixing all the inlines with sse2_? Probably m
From: raghuveer devulapalli
These helper function will be reused in pixman-avx2.c implementations in
the future.
---
pixman/pixman-sse2.c | 504 +--
pixman/pixman-sse2.h | 502 ++
2 files changed, 503 insertions(+),
