Andrea Canciani writes:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
>>> From: Siarhei Siamashka
>>>
>>> Simple rotation and translation are the additional cases when BILINEAR
>>> filter can be safely reduced to NEAR
If I understand this right, I also think the "simple" test is all that
is needed. The only interesting matrixes are 1:1 scale with integer
translations. There are exactly eight arrangements of the upper-left
corner: with ±1 in location 0,0 and 1,1, and with ±1 in locations 0,1
and 1,0. I think
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>>> wrote:
From: Siarhei Siamashka
Simple rotati
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
>> wrote:
>>> From: Siarhei Siamashka
>>>
>>> Simple rotation and translation are the additional cases when BILINEAR
>>> filte
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Andrea Canciani wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
> wrote:
>> From: Siarhei Siamashka
>>
>> Simple rotation and translation are the additional cases when BILINEAR
>> filter can be safely reduced to NEAREST.
>
> I believe that this reduc
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Siarhei Siamashka
wrote:
> From: Siarhei Siamashka
>
> Simple rotation and translation are the additional cases when BILINEAR
> filter can be safely reduced to NEAREST.
I believe that this reduction is valid for any matrix which describes
a unit transform follow
From: Siarhei Siamashka
Simple rotation and translation are the additional cases when BILINEAR
filter can be safely reduced to NEAREST.
---
pixman/pixman-image.c | 37 +
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pixman/pixman-image.c b/
