Have you seen my new set of patches? I tried to preserve the
reconstruction/sampling filter api but fix some problems I found.
___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pixman
Actually. as long as you can also specify the filter width, there is no
need for a filter that matches BILINEAR, because linear at size = 1 will
match. So I think I can clean up this patch to remove the differences in
the set of filters from the older one.
This is still a problem for
On 08/10/2014 12:51 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote:
Hi,
The first patch in this series, which changes the choice of scale for so
that it is based on the bounding box of a transformed ellipse, rather
than a transformed square makes sense to me. As you say, this makes the
filter more invariant under
Hi,
The first patch in this series, which changes the choice of scale for so
that it is based on the bounding box of a transformed ellipse, rather
than a transformed square makes sense to me. As you say, this makes the
filter more invariant under rotations and also less blurry. Also, since
the
Changes from previous version of these patches:
- Renamed PIXMAN_KERNEL_IMPULSE to NEAREST to match PIXMAN_FILTER_NEAREST
- Use NEAREST for mirror reflections if possible
- Code cleanup to reduce diff and to use pixman coding standards
___
Pixman
