Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
> Perhaps SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc should be merged? I don't remember > what our criteria were for merginc documentation in with the rest of the > package, if we had any. Longer term I think we want to merge these but until we have the filtering support there, I've been mostly leaving the *-doc[s] packages separate since they tend to be large. In the case of SUNWerlang-doc, it contributes 45MB (!) to the image so keeping it separate makes sense I think (on the other hand, SUNWerlang itself contributes 278MB!) On the other hand, SUNWpampkcs11-docs is fairly small so it seems folding it into SUNWpampkcs11 is reasonable. > Otherwise, looks fine. Thanks. dsc ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
> I'm not sure there's a place for one-size-fits-all dogma here. But > I'd think the default should be that you get the docs with the > software. As an occasional Erlang victim, I'd really want it. -Tim Well, the difference in terms of damage to your disk is 278MB (without docs) or 323MB (including docs). At these sizes, perhaps it doesn't matter combining the documentation but a 45MB increase still makes me do a double take. :-) dsc ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 07:53:44PM -0700, Tim Bray wrote: > I'm not sure there's a place for one-size-fits-all dogma here. But I'd > think the default should be that you get the docs with the software. As an > occasional Erlang victim, I'd really want it. -Tim Certainly, that's the direction we want to go in -- you get all the "accessories" with the main functionality when you install the package, unless you explicitly ask otherwise. Man pages, other docs, developer bits, etc. We haven't been terribly consistent in merging these packages so far, so I just wanted to make sure that David either intended this, or could come up with a good reason for it after the fact. :) Danek ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Danek Duvall wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:51:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-2561/ > > Perhaps SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc should be merged? I don't > remember > what our criteria were for merginc documentation in with the rest of > the > package, if we had any. I'm not sure there's a place for one-size-fits-all dogma here. But I'd think the default should be that you get the docs with the software. As an occasional Erlang victim, I'd really want it. -Tim ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
Re: [pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 05:51:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-2561/ Perhaps SUNWerlang and SUNWerlang-doc should be merged? I don't remember what our criteria were for merginc documentation in with the rest of the package, if we had any. Otherwise, looks fine. Thanks, Danek ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
[pkg-discuss] Code review request for snv_94 resync
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~comay/webrev-2561/ which covers 2561 X packages could use some manual dependencies 2591 resync repository to snv_94 Thanks, dsc ___ pkg-discuss mailing list pkg-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-discuss
