[pkg-go] Bug#799128: ITP: golang-github-juju-ratelimit -- Efficient token-bucket-based rate limiter module for Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Potter X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go * Package name: golang-github-juju-ratelimit Version : 0.0~git20150619 Upstream Author : Roger Peppe * URL :

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On 14 Sep 2015, at 3:09 am, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On 13 September 2015 at 10:07, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> To -alpha or ~alpha? > > Also, upstream has nice version tags[1], so why are we packaging a > snapshot instead of using debian/watch and a

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On 14 Sep 2015, at 5:11 am, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On 13 September 2015 at 12:00, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> To be more clear: I'm working on renaming the source package now, but >> would appreciate if you'd clarify the reasoning for the license >> mismatch.

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson

On 11 Sep 2015, at 10:09 pm, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Thursday 10 September 2015 23:30:54 Potter, Tim wrote: >> This should be ready for uploading now. > > Tim, upstream do not have copyright attribution anywhere in source so I can't > find where "Copyright: 2012-2015

Re: [pkg-go] Thoughts on the golang-go package for arm64?

On 10 Sep 2015, at 7:41 am, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > arm64 support is new in 1.5, which afaik isn't in debian yet. It can > be bootstrapped with gccgo, which is what we did for Ubuntu: > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/golang > > (based on

[pkg-go] Thoughts on the golang-go package for arm64?

Hi everyone. I’m curious about the status of Go for arm64. According to d/control there is a pkg-golang-devel address on alioth, but the archives seem pretty empty. Also the uploaders are basically the usual suspects on this list. (-: I believe there is some kind of self-hosted building

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-bugsnag-go

On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:56 pm, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 26 May 2015 at 18:53, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > <timothy.pot...@hp.com> wrote: >> I had a chat to tianon on the weekend and he suggested that libcontainer did >> not need to be sp

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-bugsnag-go

On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:46 am, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 September 2015 22:55:13 Potter, Tim wrote: >> On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:56 pm, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On 26 May 2015 at 18:53, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)

[pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-juju-loggo

Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished renaming it and testing against the new naming policy. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

[pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished renaming it and testing against the new naming policy. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-juju-loggo

On 9 Sep 2015, at 1:36 pm, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:29:04AM +0000, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished >> renaming >> it and testing

Re: [pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:37 am, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1_amd64.changes uploaded > successfully to localhost > along with the files: > golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.dsc >

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: a clutch of small go packages

[Resend as first try was bounced as spam] > On 27 Aug 2015, at 7:42 am, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: > > n 27 Aug 2015, at 2:26 am, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Thanks for your work on these p

[pkg-go] RFS: New upstream version of golang-gocheck (Closes #785772)

Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any attention. A newer version of gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On 9 Sep 2015, at 1:34 pm, Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:28:59AM +0000, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished >> renaming >> it and testing

[pkg-go] Bug#796862: ITP: golang-github-d2g-dhcp4client -- DHCP client written in Go

X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tim Potter t...@hpe.com * Package name: golang-github-d2g-dhcp4client Version : 0.0~git20150520 Upstream Author : Dan Goldsmith * URL :

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

On 30 Jul 2015, at 5:08 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:05 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote: On 28 Jul 2015, at 5:14 pm, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: So, yes, if you could work with upstream

[pkg-go] Bug#793518: Bug#793518: Bug#793518: FTBFS: TestString fails: ini_test.go:167: Dict cannot be stringified as expected.

solution and then we could just package a new upstream snapshot, that’d be great. OK - I’ll work on that then. Tim. On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:02 AM, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) timothy.pot...@hp.com wrote: On 28 Jul 2015, at 6:35 am, solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com wrote: On Mon, Jul