On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 13:57 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think the right answer will eventually be:
> https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/pull/2568
Merged, so the swarmkit dep on containerd is now gone which I hope will
simplify your life.
It's code removal and some small localised tweaks to
On 03/23/2018 08:57 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 10:35 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> I think a bunch of the problems you are having are with the build of
>> the `swarmd` binary.
> I finally realised that the swarmkit→container dep was only for the
> unmaintained containerd
On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 10:35 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I think a bunch of the problems you are having are with the build of
> the `swarmd` binary.
I finally realised that the swarmkit→container dep was only for the
unmaintained containerd executor (this was very dense of me since I
wrote it way
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 16:51 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> For more details, the error I get when trying to build swarmkit against
> containerd v1.0.2 is:
(disclaimer: this is all my personal opinion only, not official advice)
I think a bunch of the problems you are having are with the build
On 03/22/2018 03:52 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I wasn't aware of that, how strange. I suppose the rationale is that
> v1.1 will be upwards compatible with v1.0, but still...
>
> I'll mention this to some folks internally and see what, if anything,
> can be done.
Cool, thanks for relaying the
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 10:22 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> On 03/16/2018 04:43 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> In an ideal world, we should try to convince the docker people to use
> stable APIs (that means using only released non-alpha versions!),
> >>> FWIW the engine uses a non-alpha
On 03/16/2018 04:43 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
In an ideal world, we should try to convince the docker people to use
stable APIs (that means using only released non-alpha versions!),
>>> FWIW the engine uses a non-alpha version in recent releases. It seems
>>> to be swarmkit (another dep of
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 08:59 +0700, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> On 03/15/2018 08:42 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 12:52 +, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > > I sometimes have kept small dependencies vendored in for
> > > convenience..
> > > But keeping the whole containerd seems
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 3:19 AM, Arnaud Rebillout <
arnaud.rebill...@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/15/2018 07:52 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > On 15/03/18 09:22, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> >
> >> So I made a beginner mistake, but I'm learning, and hopefully I'm on the
> >> right track !
> >
On 03/15/2018 08:42 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 12:52 +, Martín Ferrari wrote:
I sometimes have kept small dependencies vendored in for
convenience..
But keeping the whole containerd seems wrong to me.
OTOH it _might_ not be totally unreasonable to apply that tactic to
10 matches
Mail list logo
