Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 3:40:13 AM AEST Martín Ferrari wrote: > On 05/04/16 02:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Again, this is my fault. The first golang packages I prepared had a + > instead of a ~, because I was mistaken. Had to package so many > dependencies, got some things wrong :( Don't

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 05/04/16 02:22, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Oh, one thing you'll need to change: the current version is (for some > reason) 0.0+git20150627.7ad95dd-1, which is greater than your version > of 0.0~git20160301.0.a83829b-1 :-) I guess this means some mucking > about in the upstream and

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh, one thing you'll need to change: the current version is (for some reason) 0.0+git20150627.7ad95dd-1, which is greater than your version of 0.0~git20160301.0.a83829b-1 :-) I guess this means some mucking about in the upstream and pristine-tar branches too. On 5 April 2016 at 12:05, Michael

[pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
Hi everyone. It turns out that the golang-yaml.v2 package needs an update to support the version of golang in stretch, version 1.6. I guess the latest version of Go introduces backwards-incompatible changes to the language. )-: Could someone give my latest push to alioth a review and upload