Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Anthony Fok wrote: > Hello all, > > I would like to package Hugo ( http://gohugo.io/ ) for Debian, > and I am starting to package the various Go packages that > Hugo depends on. > > One of the packages that need updating is golang-blackfriday >

[pkg-go] Bug#798328: ITP: golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman -- Go library for printing to the terminal and logging to files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anthony Fok * Package name: golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman Version : 0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171-1 Upstream Author : Steve Francia * URL : https://github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman * License : MIT

[pkg-go] golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman_0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman_0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman_0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman_0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171-1.dsc golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman_0.0~git20141219.0.3d60171.orig.tar.xz

[pkg-go] golang-github-spf13-pflag_0.0~git20150820.0.8e7dc10-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-spf13-pflag-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-spf13-pflag is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be

[pkg-go] Processing of etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes

etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1.dsc etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2.orig.tar.xz etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1.debian.tar.xz etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.deb golang-etcd-server-dev_2.1.3+dfsg2-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue

[pkg-go] etcd_2.1.3+dfsg2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:47:20 +1000 Source: etcd Binary: etcd golang-etcd-server-dev Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 2.1.3+dfsg2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

Hello all, I would like to package Hugo ( http://gohugo.io/ ) for Debian, and I am starting to package the various Go packages that Hugo depends on. One of the packages that need updating is golang-blackfriday because Hugo depends on some new features in the latest russross/blackfriday in git

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-spf13-pflag_0.0~git20150820.0.8e7dc10-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-spf13-pflag_0.0~git20150820.0.8e7dc10-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-spf13-pflag_0.0~git20150820.0.8e7dc10-1.dsc golang-github-spf13-pflag_0.0~git20150820.0.8e7dc10.orig.tar.xz

[pkg-go] Updated pkg-go post-receive hook

Hi all, I noticed that the PET page was seriously out of date. Tracing this issue I found out that we are not calling the PET helper on post-commit, as we should. So I have just updated the common script to do that and more. Taking from the pkg-perl example, the new script will call KGB for IRC

[pkg-go] golang-gocolorize_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 12:20:12 +1000 Source: golang-gocolorize Binary: golang-github-agtorre-gocolorize-dev Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] golang-pault-go-config_0.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2015 12:47:41 -0700 Source: golang-pault-go-config Binary: golang-pault-go-config-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] golang-airbrake-go_0.0~git20150109-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:03:42 +1000 Source: golang-airbrake-go Binary: golang-github-tobi-airbrake-go-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.0~git20150109-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] golang-raven-go_0.0~git20150721.0.74c334d-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:23:08 +1000 Source: golang-raven-go Binary: golang-github-getsentry-raven-go-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.0~git20150721.0.74c334d-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] golang-osext_0.0~git20150409-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 18:31:44 +1000 Source: golang-osext Binary: golang-github-kardianos-osext-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.0~git20150409-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: pkg-go

[pkg-go] Bug#798349: ITP: golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap -- Go library to detect starting from Windows Explorer

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anthony Fok * Package name: golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap Version : 0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae-1 Upstream Author : Alan Shreve * URL : https://github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap * License :

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap_0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap_0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap_0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae-1.dsc golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap_0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae.orig.tar.xz

[pkg-go] golang-github-azure-go-autorest_0.1~alpha-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:06:37 -0700 Source: golang-github-azure-go-autorest Binary: golang-github-azure-go-autorest-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.1~alpha-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer:

[pkg-go] golang-github-rainycape-unidecode_0.0~git20150906.0.c9cf8cd-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:26:06 -0400 Source: golang-github-rainycape-unidecode Binary: golang-github-rainycape-unidecode-dev Architecture: source all Version: 0.0~git20150906.0.c9cf8cd-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency:

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-samalba-dockerclient_0.0~git20150905.0.77b723e-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-samalba-dockerclient_0.0~git20150905.0.77b723e-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-samalba-dockerclient_0.0~git20150905.0.77b723e-1.dsc golang-github-samalba-dockerclient_0.0~git20150905.0.77b723e.orig.tar.bz2

[pkg-go] Bug#798342: ITP: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient -- Docker client library in Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Owner: Dmitry Smirnov * Package name: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient Version : 0.0+git20150905-1 Upstream Author : go-dockerclient authors * URL :

[pkg-go] golang-github-vbatts-tar-split_0.9.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Tianon, please mention the files that are (C) from go authors and licensed under BSD in your debian/copyright. Thanks! Thorsten === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-mesos-mesos-go_0.0~git20150903.0.d98afa6-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-mesos-mesos-go_0.0~git20150903.0.d98afa6-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-mesos-mesos-go_0.0~git20150903.0.d98afa6-1.dsc golang-github-mesos-mesos-go_0.0~git20150903.0.d98afa6.orig.tar.bz2

Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:00:34AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > 1. ... just go ahead and update them? :-) > > Yes. Yesish. Yes, you should absolutely update them, but you should also check all their reverse build dependencies to ensure that we don't cause FTBFSs. Yo, sECuRE - is RATT

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3-1.dsc golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.xz

[pkg-go] golang-github-emicklei-go-restful_1.1.3-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-emicklei-go-restful-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-emicklei-go-restful is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid),

[pkg-go] golang-github-mesos-mesos-go_0.0~git20150903.0.d98afa6-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-mesos-mesos-go-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-mesos-mesos-go is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please

[pkg-go] golang-github-gosimple-slug_0.0~git20150820.0.fb135f0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-gosimple-slug-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-gosimple-slug is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please

Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

Yeah, https://github.com/Debian/ratt should be ready to use. Please let me know of any issues you encounter. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:37 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 09:00:34AM +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> > 1. ... just go ahead and update

[pkg-go] golang-github-samalba-dockerclient_0.0~git20150905.0.77b723e-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-samalba-dockerclient-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-samalba-dockerclient is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

[pkg-go] golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap_0.0~git20141017.0.76626ae-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-inconshreveable-mousetrap is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes

[pkg-go] Bug#798364: ITP: golang-github-emicklei-go-restful -- build REST-style Web Services using Google Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Owner: Dmitry Smirnov * Package name: golang-github-emicklei-go-restful Version : 1.1.3 Upstream Author : Ernest Micklei * URL :

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-bugsnag-go

On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:56 pm, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On 26 May 2015 at 18:53, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > wrote: >> I had a chat to tianon on the weekend and he suggested that libcontainer did >> not need to be split out from golang-docker-dev so

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.dsc golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014.orig.tar.gz golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.debian.tar.xz

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-bugsnag-go

On Tuesday 08 September 2015 22:55:13 Potter, Tim wrote: > On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:56 pm, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > On 26 May 2015 at 18:53, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > > wrote: > > > >> I had a chat to tianon on the weekend and he suggested that

[pkg-go] golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-bugsnag-panicwrap-dev is NEW. source:golang-bugsnag-panicwrap is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-go-xorm-xorm_0.4.3+git20150905.0.4012ee5-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-go-xorm-xorm_0.4.3+git20150905.0.4012ee5-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-go-xorm-xorm_0.4.3+git20150905.0.4012ee5-1.dsc golang-github-go-xorm-xorm_0.4.3+git20150905.0.4012ee5.orig.tar.bz2

[pkg-go] Bug#798418: ITP: hugo -- Fast and flexible Static Site Generator written in Go

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anthony Fok * Package name: hugo Version : 0.14+git20150908.197.daf5f32-1 Upstream Author : Steve Francia and friends * URL : https://github.com/spf13/hugo * License : SimPL-2.0 (Simple Public License)

[pkg-go] BTS best practice

Dear Golang team, I just want to remind everybody to tag uploaded ITP bugs as "pending" and to maintain "block" relationships between ITP/RFP bugs. This is helpful for those of us who work with hierarchies of dependencies. `bts` [1] command could be particularly useful or the email interface

Re: [pkg-go] BTS best practice

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:00:48PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Dear Golang team, > > I just want to remind everybody to tag uploaded ITP bugs as "pending" and to > maintain "block" relationships between ITP/RFP bugs. This is helpful for > those of us who work with hierarchies of

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema_0.0~git20150424.0.f92a08f-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema_0.0~git20150424.0.f92a08f-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema_0.0~git20150424.0.f92a08f-1.dsc golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema_0.0~git20150424.0.f92a08f.orig.tar.bz2

[pkg-go] Bug#798416: ITP: golang-github-spf13-cobra -- A Commander for modern Go CLI interactions

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Anthony Fok * Package name: golang-github-spf13-cobra Version : 0.0~git20150904.0.68f5a81-1 Upstream Authors: Steve Francia, Eric Paris * URL : https://github.com/spf13/cobra * License : Apache-2.0

[pkg-go] golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema_0.0~git20150424.0.f92a08f-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-seandolphin-bqschema is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

[pkg-go] golang-github-go-xorm-xorm_0.4.3+git20150905.0.4012ee5-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-go-xorm-xorm-dev is NEW. source:golang-github-go-xorm-xorm is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be

Re: [pkg-go] May I upgrade golang-blackfriday, golang-testify, etc. to latest versions?

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 06:05:45PM -0600, Anthony Fok wrote: > > No, but you should rename the existing packages to the proper name. > > See other recently uploaded packages for examples on how to do that > > with regards to Breaks/Replaces if you’re unsure about that. > > Thank you for this very

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-bugsnag-go

On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:46 am, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 September 2015 22:55:13 Potter, Tim wrote: >> On 3 Sep 2015, at 11:56 pm, Tianon Gravi wrote: >>> On 26 May 2015 at 18:53, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) >>> wrote:

[pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-juju-loggo

Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished renaming it and testing against the new naming policy. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

[pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished renaming it and testing against the new naming policy. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-juju-loggo

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:29:04AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished > renaming > it and testing against the new naming policy. > > Could someone please review and upload? Same Vcs-* bug here > > > Thanks, >

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-vbatts-tar-split_0.9.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 8 September 2015 at 12:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please mention the files that are (C) from go authors and licensed under > BSD in your debian/copyright. Doh. Thanks for the pointer! I'll update d/copyright appropriately and re-upload. :) ♥, - Tianon

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: New upstream version of golang-gocheck (Closes #785772)

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:31:25AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any > attention. A newer version of > gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug. > > Could someone please review and

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-juju-loggo

On 9 Sep 2015, at 1:36 pm, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:29:04AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished >> renaming >> it and testing against the new naming policy. >>

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: New upstream version of golang-gocheck (Closes #785772)

On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:38:18PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:31:25AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > > Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any > > attention. A newer version of > > gocheck is required for bugsnag, and

Re: [pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

On Tuesday 08 September 2015 23:23:08 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > You can check for this by installing the package after you build it. Usually I do that... :( > I'll reject it now. No sense in including it in a broken state. Fair enough, thank you. I'll re-upload corrected package ASAP once I

[pkg-go] golang-github-golang-mock_0.0~git20150821.0.06883d9-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-golang-mock-dev is NEW. binary:mockgen is NEW. source:golang-github-golang-mock is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are

[pkg-go] golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-bugsnag-panicwrap-dev is NEW. source:golang-bugsnag-panicwrap is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please

Re: [pkg-go] BTS best practice

On 09/09/15 05:15, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: >> I just want to remind everybody to tag uploaded ITP bugs as "pending" and to >> maintain "block" relationships between ITP/RFP bugs. This is helpful for >> those of us who work with hierarchies of dependencies. > > I don't know that I'll go out of

Re: [pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

On 9 Sep 2015, at 10:37 am, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1_amd64.changes uploaded > successfully to localhost > along with the files: > golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.dsc >

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-gopkg-gcfg.v1_0.0~git20150907.0.0ef1a85-1_amd64.changes

golang-gopkg-gcfg.v1_0.0~git20150907.0.0ef1a85-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-gopkg-gcfg.v1_0.0~git20150907.0.0ef1a85-1.dsc golang-gopkg-gcfg.v1_0.0~git20150907.0.0ef1a85.orig.tar.bz2

[pkg-go] Bug#798422: lintian: please add "go-import-path" to the list of allowed source fields

Package: src:lintian Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org This field is used by dh-golang[1][2] to determine the proper location inside /usr/share/gocode for the files of the package, and is useful for other automation too. I've attached the

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: a clutch of small go packages

[Resend as first try was bounced as spam] > On 27 Aug 2015, at 7:42 am, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > wrote: > > n 27 Aug 2015, at 2:26 am, Michael Stapelberg wrote: >> >> Thanks for your work on these packages! >> >> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at

Re: [pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 01:19:09PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Wednesday 09 September 2015 02:58:43 Potter, Tim wrote: > > Unfortunately this package needs to be re-uploaded, as there was a missing > > rename of an install dependency. > > Right, I've corrected package name in Build-Depends

[pkg-go] RFS: New upstream version of golang-gocheck (Closes #785772)

Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any attention. A newer version of gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug. Could someone please review and upload? Thanks, Tim. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:28:59AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished > renaming > it and testing against the new naming policy. > > Could someone please review and upload? Ah, your RFS was missing a -go :) --

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On 9 Sep 2015, at 1:34 pm, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:28:59AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: >> Hi everyone. This package is required for bugsnag and I’ve just finished >> renaming >> it and testing against the new naming policy. >>

[pkg-go] golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Rejecting to fix broken depends === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

[pkg-go] golang-github-vbatts-tar-split_0.9.7-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:golang-github-vbatts-tar-split-dev is NEW. binary:tar-split is NEW. source:golang-github-vbatts-tar-split is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-github-golang-mock_0.0~git20150821.0.06883d9-1_amd64.changes

golang-github-golang-mock_0.0~git20150821.0.06883d9-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-github-golang-mock_0.0~git20150821.0.06883d9-1.dsc golang-github-golang-mock_0.0~git20150821.0.06883d9.orig.tar.bz2

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:46:41AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote: > On 9 Sep 2015, at 1:34 pm, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:28:59AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) > > wrote: > >> Hi everyone. This package is required for

[pkg-go] Processing of golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git20141111-1_amd64.changes

golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.dsc golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014.orig.tar.gz golang-bugsnag-panicwrap_0.0~git2014-1.debian.tar.xz

[pkg-go] golang-pault-go-debian 0.4-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the golang-pault-go-debian source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3-1 Current version: 0.4-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[pkg-go] Processing of minica_1.0-1_amd64.changes

minica_1.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: minica_1.0-1.dsc minica_1.0.orig.tar.gz minica_1.0-1.debian.tar.xz minica_1.0-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)

[pkg-go] minica_1.0-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:minica is NEW. source:minica is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient. Packages are routinely processed

[pkg-go] etcd.git

Hey onlyjob, was trying to push a minor update to the Build-Depends for etcd to add | relations for the expanded names of dependencies (especially for #797903), but found that some of the subfolders inside "objects" on git.d.o have broken permissions: