[pkg-go] Bug#794454: src:dh-make-golang has incorrect Vcs-*

4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 From 882bd38e0f324991b0593270ff1151adc94b6e74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tianon Gravi admwig...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:25:29 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix Vcs-* headers --- debian/control | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[pkg-go] Bug#803388: golang-gopkg-mgo.v2-dev: over-aggressive depends

Package: golang-gopkg-mgo.v2-dev Version: 2015.06.03-2 Currently, the -dev package depends on both mongodb-server and supervisor. I can't see a reason for supervisor to be in any of the relations of this package, but mongodb-server really ought to be in Suggests instead since it's not necessary

[pkg-go] Bug#803388: Bug#803388: golang-gopkg-mgo.v2-dev: over-aggressive depends

On 29 October 2015 at 07:35, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > Currently, the -dev package depends on both mongodb-server and > supervisor. I can't see a reason for supervisor to be in any of the > relations of this package, but mongodb-server really ought to be in >

[pkg-go] Bug#803130: Bug#803130: libdevel-cover-perl and golang-golang-x-tools: error when trying to install together

On 27 October 2015 at 01:28, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be > slightly out of sync): > > /usr/bin/cover Doh -- I'll update golang-golang-x-tools to not

[pkg-go] Bug#803321: Bug#803321: rawdns: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/debian/tmp/dh-exec.ShSIquIE/etc/rawdns.json': No such file or

On 28 October 2015 at 12:08, Chris Lamb wrote: > rawdns fails to build from source in unstable/amd64: I just tested this in a fresh sbuild schroot and I can't seem to reproduce the failure (the package builds just fine here). Any ideas for how I could more easily reproduce the

[pkg-go] Bug#802988: golang-golang-x-tools conflict with golang-go

block 802945 802988 thanks Thanks for the reports and patches, Hilko and Russ! I've got the go-ahead from sECuRE to upload a fixed golang-golang-x-tools, so I'm going to take care of this conflict shortly. :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

[pkg-go] Bug#802787: Bug#802787: golang-github-tinylib-msgp: FTBFS: constant 2147483747 overflows int

fixed 802787 golang-github-tinylib-msgp/1.0~alpha-2 thanks On 23 October 2015 at 15:50, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> wrote: > My patch was merged upstream and I've uploaded a new build, but I'm > holding off closing the bug until I see whether the buildds actually > build

[pkg-go] Bug#802787: golang-github-tinylib-msgp: FTBFS: constant 2147483747 overflows int

fowarded 802787 https://github.com/tinylib/msgp/pull/135 thanks Thanks for the report -- I've sent a patch upstream, and will apply a fix to the package as soon as they've merged a fix there. :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

[pkg-go] Bug#802787: Bug#802787: golang-github-tinylib-msgp: FTBFS: constant 2147483747 overflows int

On 23 October 2015 at 08:24, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Builds of golang-github-tinylib-msgp for 32-bit architectures such as > i386 have been failing: My patch was merged upstream and I've uploaded a new build, but I'm holding off closing the bug until I see whether the buildds

[pkg-go] Bug#804294: boltdb: upstream version bump: 1.1.0

> > Feel free to make the upload, as I am currently going trough an exams > period :) > > Let me know if you have any issues, I can always find time to help. > > thank you for your work! > > On 06/11/15 07:52 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> Package: src:golang-github-boltd

[pkg-go] Bug#804294: boltdb: upstream version bump: 1.1.0

3963ae..fd83aec 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +golang-github-boltdb-bolt (1.1.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Update to 1.1.0 upstream release. + + -- Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:14:31 -0800 + golang-github-bolt

[pkg-go] Bug#803388: Bug#803388: golang-gopkg-mgo.v2-dev: over-aggressive depends

Alexandre, On 29 October 2015 at 12:51, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > On 29 October 2015 at 07:35, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: >> Currently, the -dev package depends on both mongodb-server and >> supervisor. I can't see a reason

[pkg-go] Bug#803321: Bug#803321: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#803321: rawdns: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat 'debian/tmp/debian/tmp/dh-exec.ShSIquIE/etc/rawdns.json': No such file or

On 28 October 2015 at 12:55, Niko Tyni wrote: > Looks like #802034, fixed today in dh-exec_0.22. Indeed! https://reproducible.debian.net/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rawdns.html appears happy now, so I'm going to close this. Thanks Chris for the heads up and thanks Niko for the

[pkg-go] Bug#804187: go-sqlite3: please package v1.1.0

Package: src:golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3 Version: 1.0.0~dfsg1-2 It'd be really helpful if we could get a bump to v1.1.0 released on Sep 5th. :) (Needing this for Docker 1.9.0.) As usual, willing to do the bump work myself as a team upload if you'd prefer! ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819

[pkg-go] Bug#804277: ITP: consul -- Consul is a tool for service discovery, monitoring and configuration

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: consul Version : 0.5.2-1 Upstream Author : HashiCorp * URL : https://github.com/hashicorp/consul * License

[pkg-go] Bug#801595: Bug#801595: Bug#801595: ratt calls sbuild in a way that uses the user's sbuildrc

On 14 October 2015 at 10:06, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > I’m a bit hesitant to do this. If a user specified custom settings in their > ~/.sbuildrc, they are probably there for a reason and should be considered > when using ratt, right? I'm not exactly a long-time user of

Re: [pkg-go] Building the race detector runtime support from source

This is neat! Any particular reason you went straight for an SVN snapshot instead of http://llvm.org/releases/3.7.0/compiler-rt-3.7.0.src.tar.xz ? Just because that's what the Go README does, or was there some kind of incompatibility? Also, does anyone know if there's already a source package

Re: [pkg-go] Building the race detector runtime support from source

On 8 October 2015 at 06:50, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > Also, does anyone know if there's already a source package consuming > the compiler-rt tarball that we could maybe patch to run this script > into a new binary package? :) Turns out src:llvm-toolchain-3.5

[pkg-go] Bug#801593: Bug#801593: Bug#801593: ratt does not find all reverse build dependencies

On 14 October 2015 at 22:37, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Extracting all binary packages introduced by your upload is trivial. Just look > at the Binary: field in your .changes file. Just to note, in the case of Paul's interface in "pault.ag/go/debian/control", that'd be

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

they come?) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 On 15 October 2015 at 11:08, Michael Stapelberg <stapelb...@debian.org> wrote: > Do you have a link with details? I’m curious. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:45 PM, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

On 15 October 2015 at 10:40, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > FWIW, I don’t think that’s necessary for the compiler itself. Go adheres to > its Go 1 stability guarantee, and any package which breaks likely did > something wrong in the first place :). If this is the only thing

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-miekg-pkcs11_0.0~git20150918.0.44a65bd-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11 October 2015 at 09:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please add the missing license of Researching where these .h files came from was definitely a very interesting history lesson in PKCS #11. O:) Thanks for pointing these out; I've got a new upload up which

[pkg-go] Bug#801558: Bug#801558: Bug#801558: golang-codegangsta-cli-dev: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/codegangsta/cli/command.go

On 12 October 2015 at 10:20, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> wrote: > | Replaces: golang-codegangsta-cli-dev (<< 0.0~git20150117-1~) > | Breaks: golang-codegangsta-cli-dev (<< 0.0~git20150117-1~) > | Provides: golang-codegangsta-cli-dev > > Are the version num

[pkg-go] Bug#801558: Bug#801558: golang-codegangsta-cli-dev: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/codegangsta/cli/command.go

On 11 October 2015 at 21:56, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails > because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a > Breaks+Replaces relation. Hmm, this seems strange, because

[pkg-go] Bug#798649: Bug#798649: Bug#798649: golang-golang-x-net-dev: new upstream release?

On 13 September 2015 at 11:12, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Sure, I will look into it later today or tomorrow. It's been a bit since this message; mind if I take a stab at bumping it for you? :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

[pkg-go] Bug#805040: Bug#805040: consul-migrate: FTBFS on ppc64: undefined: maxMapSize

On 13 November 2015 at 08:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > The consul-migrate build for (big-endian) ppc64 failed: > > # github.com/boltdb/bolt > src/github.com/boltdb/bolt/db.go:85: undefined: maxMapSize > src/github.com/boltdb/bolt/db.go:85: invalid array bound maxMapSize Arg,

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#804187: Please upload golang-github-mattn-go-sqlite3 1.1.0_dfsg1-1

On 18 November 2015 at 12:48, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Sorry but I got to it first. ;) :D thanks! ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-vbatts-tar-split_0.9.7-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 8 September 2015 at 12:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > please mention the files that are (C) from go authors and licensed under > BSD in your debian/copyright. Doh. Thanks for the pointer! I'll update d/copyright appropriately and re-upload. :) ♥, - Tianon

[pkg-go] Bug#798422: lintian: please add "go-import-path" to the list of allowed source fields

♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 From c64a0e46299cffd7faad3a937106e655d47c5428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 19:48:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] d/common/source-fields: Add "go-import-path"

Re: [pkg-go] etcd.git

On 9 September 2015 at 00:01, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I have no idea how could this happen... I've never touched any files in > etcd.git bare repository other than remotely pushing from my workstation just > like I do with all other repositories all the time... > > I did > >

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

On 13 September 2015 at 10:07, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > To -alpha or ~alpha? Also, upstream has nice version tags[1], so why are we packaging a snapshot instead of using debian/watch and a direct release version? Is there a package that needs newer commits? If so, have we

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go_1.2~git20150611.0.97d9593-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 14 September 2015 at 09:00, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > Please mention the BSD license in your debian/copyright Jeez, I'm on a roll... Thanks so much for your help catching all these! :) I'll make some changes to my workflow to (hopefully) help me catch these

[pkg-go] etcd.git

b 17 2015 04/ drwxrwsr-x 2 jelmer scm_pkg-go 4.0K Sep 8 06:41 05/ Mind fixing those and/or applying the attached patch? Thanks! ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 From 9bafc7e4b328be81c1951246714b745d9197ba96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tianon Gra

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#799907: golang 1.5 does not build under arm64

On 23 September 2015 at 20:45, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > Hi there. I’ve found and fixed a build bug on arm64 for golang in the > delian-experimental branch, > fixed by the attached patch. According to the GoArm page on the golang wiki > [1] GOARCH needs >

[pkg-go] Bug#807002: nmu: golang-golang-x-net-dev_0.0+git20151007.b846920+dfsg-1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: paul...@debian.org, pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Hello, Due to a typo of mine while preparing the upload, src:golang-go.crypto 1:0.0~git20151201.0.7b85b09-1 was

[pkg-go] Bug#806175: Bug#806175: Please update golang-golang-x-oauth2 to latest upstream version

On 24 November 2015 at 17:50, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > This packages needs to be updated to the latest upstream version so that the > golang-google-grpc > package can also be updated to the latest upstream version. I've done a test build of a newer snapshot

[pkg-go] Bug#806179: Bug#806179: Please update golang-google-rpc to latest upstream version

On 24 November 2015 at 18:19, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > This packages needs to be updated to the latest upstream version so that the > golang-github-docker-notary package can also be updated to the latest upstream > version. I've done a test build of a newer

[pkg-go] Bug#806481: Bug#806481: Bug#806481: Backport etcd to Jessie

On 28 November 2015 at 12:40, Matthew Dawson wrote: > To get everything working did require a newer golang (1.4 in my case). Heh, you're in luck; Go 1.5.1 got accepted into jessie-backports just recently. :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25

Re: [pkg-go] RFP: github-hub -- hub helps you win at git

On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:33:25 -0500 =?utf-8?q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= < anar...@debian.org> wrote: > * Package name: github-hub > Version : 2.2.2 > Upstream Author : https://github.com/github/hub/graphs/contributors > * URL : https://hub.github.com/ > * License :

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

On 31 January 2016 at 00:01, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Though it would be nice if anyone else say "OK" for this proposal. I feel > uncomfortable that nobody supported it and silence can't be interpreted as an > agreement. I had voiced my own +1 on the pkg-golang-devel thread

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 19 February 2016 at 02:12, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > Will take a look at all the other things you point out too - thanks for the > feedback. Just a note that I've just updated https://people.debian.org/~tianon/todo-docker.txt with the current state. For

[pkg-go] Bug#803133: Bug#803133: etcd: FTBFS on ppc64

On 12 February 2016 at 00:03, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Etcd upstream fixed that by bundling never snapshot of BoltDB. Looks like BoltDB upstream could do with a friendly prod to ask nicely for a new version tag to be released. :) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36

[pkg-go] Bug#796400: Bug#796400: Bug#796400: Bug#796400: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

On 25 August 2015 at 10:21, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > I don’t think the intention of the test in question is to point out > performance regressions, so while I agree with your general statement > about flakyness in general, I’m not convinced it applies here. Is it worth

[pkg-go] Bug#796400: Bug#796400: Bug#796400: Bug#796400: golang-github-jacobsa-ratelimit: Non-determistically FTBFS due to unreliable timing in tests

On 18 February 2016 at 15:46, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > Are there any other consumers of this ratelimit package that might warrant > some kind of workaround here? Seems the answer to that is "not currently in the archive, there aren't": ("dak r

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 18 February 2016 at 21:34, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > Hi everyone. I’ve finally managed to get the nightly docker.io branch > building against sid. Some > light testing was performed at it all seems to work. Hooray! > > I don’t have permission to push to

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 18 February 2016 at 21:34, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > * consul Changes here look solid! :D ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4 ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 18 February 2016 at 22:11, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: >> * consul > > Changes here look solid! :D Arg, this one will go to NEW, so can't be source-only, and after the snafu that is #812566 I don't trust my local sbuild setup ATM. Any kind DD willing to do a

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 18 February 2016 at 22:14, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > On 18 February 2016 at 21:34, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) > <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: >> * golang-github-docker-distribution > > Hah, besides excluding one more directory of tests, it look

Re: [pkg-go] golang 1.6... basically ready for upload

On 18 February 2016 at 23:25, Hilko Bengen wrote: > May I go ahead or is someone else (Tianon?) busy on the same thing right > now? As long as you commit to Git, I'm +1! Let's get it up! :D ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

Re: [pkg-go] golang 1.6... basically ready for upload

On 18 February 2016 at 23:25, Hilko Bengen wrote: > I'll need to add some lintian-overrides and do some more testing, but I > think I could have something ready for upload by tomorrow. I've committed a changelog update for 1.6 to Git -- I'm curious what lintian-overrides

Re: [pkg-go] golang 1.6... basically ready for upload

On 20 February 2016 at 01:22, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > I've committed a changelog update for 1.6 to Git -- I'm curious what > lintian-overrides changes are necessary, though? (doing an sbuild now, so > I suppose I'll find out soon anyhow) Not seeing anything new

[pkg-go] Bug#818320: Bug#818320: golang-golang-x-tools: FTBFS with go 1.6

On 15 March 2016 at 15:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > (or you can approve my > request to join pkg-go on alioth :-p) You're long since approved by now! ;) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4

[pkg-go] Bug#819452: Bug#819452: golang-fsnotify: FTBFS, not working at all in ppc64el

forwarded 819452 https://github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify/issues/130 thanks On 28 March 2016 at 10:30, Martín Ferrari wrote: > As I reported upstream (https://github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify/issues/130), > fsnotify does not seem to work at all in ppc64el. I noticed this when trying

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

On 5 April 2016 at 14:47, Florian Weimer wrote: > We currently need these intermediate dependencies to discover all the > affected applications. So perhaps dh_golang needs to construct the > transitive closure, instead of listing just immediate build > dependencies. If we

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

> packages in a proof of concept > > On Apr 5, 2016 5:54 PM, "Tianon Gravi" <tia...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> On 5 April 2016 at 14:47, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >> > We currently need these intermediate dependencies to discover al

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#818122: docker.io: FTBFS in stretch

reassign 818122 golang-github-opencontainers-runc-dev 0.0.8+dfsg-1 retitle 818122 golang-github-opencontainers-runc-dev: missing "golang-github.com-docker-go-units" in Depends thanks On 13 March 2016 at 15:05, Santiago Vila wrote: >

[pkg-go] Bug#818122: docker.io: FTBFS in stretch

On 26 March 2016 at 21:54, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > However Docker still FTBFS for another reason unrelated to runc as far as I > can tell... It looks like an API change in the new runc (libcontainer bits):

Re: [pkg-go] docker, consul, notary and others

On 6 March 2016 at 14:47, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I'm working hard to update dependencies required by new version of docker. > If that's all right with you I'd like to join you as co-maintainer of consul, > notary, docker.io and some other packages. Getting more eyes on the

Re: [pkg-go] consul

On 7 March 2016 at 11:50, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Thanks. :) I suppose it could be handy when something irrelevant is shipped > in orig.tar. After all "~dfsg" can be changed for "+dfsg" but not the other > way, at least not after upload... Yeah, sorry -- this is my main

Re: [pkg-go] Finally built docker.io 1.9.3 from nightly branch!

On 6 March 2016 at 16:08, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > I'll take care of consul. :) Thanks Dmitry! Would you mind throwing your name on Uploaders too? (or even replacing mine outright if you'd prefer -- I don't mind either way :) ) I'm really curious about why "0.5.2~ds1-1" was

[pkg-go] Bug#821832: Bug#821832: golang-github-azure-azure-sdk-for-go: please update Azure SDK

On 20 April 2016 at 13:23, Daniel Stender wrote: > I hope it's o.k. that I've taken charge with some of your packages ... For sure -- do what's necessary and either report and fix breakage (IMO)! <3 > Yup, it seems a "transition" is needed ... thx for the pointer, great! >

[pkg-go] Bug#822395: Bug#822395: Bug#822395: Bug#822395: prometheus: FTBFS: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

On 26 April 2016 at 15:46, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Could/should dh_golang provide help for getting this right? It's kinda > similar to the work I did recently to make Built-Using more accurate > -- roughly speaking one needs the -dev package to Depend: on the >

Re: [pkg-go] Two remaining uploads for docker 1.11.0

On 23 May 2016 at 16:09, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > * golang-gocapability-dev (new upstream snapshot, various minor packaging > updates) > * golang-github-docker-go (new package, ITP #822219) By my own count, we've got a little bit more than that to get us

[pkg-go] Bug#823471: Bug#823471: golang-github-miekg-pkcs11: please update to latest upstream snapshot

On 4 May 2016 at 19:00, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > I've already packaged this in the repo on alioth. Once you've got a bug number assigned, be sure to update "debian/changelog" to include "(Closes: #xxx)" as appropriate -- I've done so here while reviewing

Re: [pkg-go] DEP-14 and backports for prometheus and docker.io

On 5 May 2016 at 18:12, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > I'm not sure whether you want to delete the master branch and set > debian-branch to > debian/sid. I think this is what you have done in some of the other pkg-go > repos you > are maintainer for. Happy to

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

On 14 April 2016 at 15:50, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Yeah, that's the problem. I was testing with a package that set GOPATH in > rules :-( I sent the same fix to the bug, or at least tried to... Oh yep, you totally did: https://bugs.debian.org/821000#20 (which

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

On 13 April 2016 at 17:43, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > @@ -156,7 +161,6 @@ sub get_targets { > sub build { > my $this = shift; > > -$ENV{GOPATH} = $this->{cwd} . '/' . $this->get_builddir(); > if (exists($ENV{DH_GOLANG_GO_GENERATE}) &&

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

On 14 April 2016 at 15:46, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this block is why that latest upload is causing everything to > fail to build -- we removed GOPATH from "sub build", but didn't add > "_set_gopath" like we did down in "sub t

Re: [pkg-go] go binary-only package

On 20 July 2016 at 15:53, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > I haven't figured out what the best way is to create an upstream source > orig.tar.gz > file that doesn't contain the vendored source though. For packages with > releases > (as opposed to snapshots of

[pkg-go] Bug#830729: Bug#830729: Bug#830729: Bug#830729: golang-github-mitchellh-go-homedir: FTBFS: homedir_test.go:44: "/home/lamby" != "~"

On 31 July 2016 at 20:20, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Patch attached to fix this, but it's a bit icky (and has been replaced by a > shell out to call > getent in a later version. Very nice catch indeed! Given that the code in question is rewritten in newer

[pkg-go] Bug#830729: Bug#830729: golang-github-mitchellh-go-homedir: FTBFS: homedir_test.go:44: "/home/lamby" != "~"

On 17 July 2016 at 08:22, Chris Lamb wrote: > So, I can make the tests pass if I *remove* the "HOME=" bit in > debian/rules. Sorry I can't be more help. It looks like it passes in the reproducible builds framework, but I think I might have a hunch for what's failing on your

[pkg-go] Bug#830729: Bug#830729: golang-github-mitchellh-go-homedir: FTBFS: homedir_test.go:44: "/home/lamby" != "~"

On 10 July 2016 at 13:30, Chris Lamb wrote: > go install -v github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir > github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir > debian/rules override_dh_auto_test > make[1]: Entering directory >

[pkg-go] Bug#830519: Bug#830519: docker-swarm: FTBFS: docker/swarm/api/flusher.go:8:2: cannot find package "github.com/docker/docker/pkg/ioutils"

On 8 July 2016 at 14:29, Chris Lamb wrote: > src/github.com/docker/swarm/api/flusher.go:8:2: cannot find package > "github.com/docker/docker/pkg/ioutils" in any of: This sounds like another case of #830478, which should've been fixed with src:docker.io 1.11.2~ds1-2 (uploaded

[pkg-go] Bug#830656: Bug#830656: Bug#830656: src:golang-github-docker-libnetwork: FTBFS due to libkv changes

On 9 July 2016 at 16:06, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Thank you very much, Tianon. :) > > Would you prefer if I upgrade libnetwork to v0.7.2-rc.1 ? Sure, that'd be great! This patch wasn't backported to 0.7.2 though, was it? (not seeing it in

[pkg-go] Bug#830656: src:golang-github-docker-libnetwork: FTBFS due to libkv changes

Package: src:golang-github-docker-libnetwork Version: 0.7.0~rc.6+dfsg-2 Severity: serious The newest upload of "docker-libkv" changed the API slightly, causing the current libnetwork version to FTBFS. | # github.com/docker/libnetwork/datastore |

[pkg-go] Bug#850951: CVE-2016-9962

On 31 January 2017 at 20:46, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > I'm preparing a patch for the package now, but I'm curious what the > implications of an upload will be so close to the freeze -- do we need > to request a freeze exception or a migration adjustment after the &g

[pkg-go] Bug#850951: Bug#850951: Bug#850951: CVE-2016-9962

On 30 January 2017 at 11:31, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Disclaimer: I'm not too deep into that. I just noticed that > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012568 though seem to > indicate as well 0.1.1 based version are affected. But I cannot tell > more (at the

[pkg-go] Bug#853866: unblock: runc/0.1.1+dfsg1-2

c-0.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2016-07-13 06:01:04.0 -0700 +++ runc-0.1.1+dfsg1/debian/changelog 2017-02-01 07:17:54.0 -0800 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +runc (0.1.1+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Backport patch for CVE-2016-9962 (Closes: #850951) + +

[pkg-go] Bug#850951: Bug#850951: CVE-2016-9962

On 11 January 2017 at 07:21, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Please see: > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012568 > https://github.com/docker/docker/compare/v1.12.5...v1.12.6 > https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/commit/50a19c6ff828c58e5dab13830bd3dacde268afe5 I've

Re: [pkg-go] update example filelist for website/packaging guide

On 4 October 2016 at 03:53, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > I seem to lack permission to push to > git+ssh://j...@git.debian.org/git/pkg-go/website.git > directly, but here's a fix to the example package filelist I tried to apply this and got similar permission errors, so I jumped

[pkg-go] Bug#841575: Bug#841575: docker-registry: FTBFS: Tests failures

On 20 November 2016 at 20:31, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > I wasn't able to dig into the details yet, but looking at the log I > noticed the following which I believe is the real test failure output: That being said, I currently get the (more severe IMO) failure when try

[pkg-go] Bug#841575: Bug#841575: docker-registry: FTBFS: Tests failures

On 21 October 2016 at 06:10, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. I wasn't able to dig into the details yet, but looking at the log I noticed the following which I believe is the real test failure output: >

Re: [pkg-go] Replace "tpot-guest" with "tpot" on Golang alioth groups

On 7 March 2017 at 16:50, Potter, Tim wrote: > Could someone please add "tpot" to the scm_pkg-go and scm_docker groups? It > might > also be good to remove "tpot-guest" from those groups as well. Done! ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35

[pkg-go] Bug#869242: Bug#869242: CVE-2017-11468

On 21 July 2017 at 15:17, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > https://github.com/docker/distribution/releases/tag/v2.6.2 is the > release which fixes this (and it links to > https://github.com/docker/distribution/commit/29fa466debaabb64f8559116bbffd20a289d523c > as the spe

[pkg-go] Bug#869242: Bug#869242: CVE-2017-11468

On 21 July 2017 at 14:35, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Please see > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2017-11468 Thanks for the report! I've started looking into the fix, and will include my notes here: https://github.com/docker/distribution/releases/tag/v2.6.2

Re: [pkg-go] Self intro and RE: CRI-O in Debian

On 10 May 2017 at 12:29, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > I've had off-list conversations with Jonathan about this, and I'll go ahead > with this for now, Jonathan and others are more than welcome to help me out > whenever they get the chance. > > I'm only beginning with debian

[pkg-go] Bug#877146: Bug#877329: Bug#877146: update to runc (1.0.0~rc4) breaks docker

On 3 October 2017 at 15:52, Bálint Réczey wrote: > I think it would be cleaner to go without the Provides: and adding > docker-containerd build-depending on > golang-github-opencontainers-docker-runc-dev, but feel free to go either way. > > I think the most efficient way

[pkg-go] Bug#877146: update to runc (1.0.0~rc4) breaks docker

On 30 September 2017 at 08:37, Bálint Réczey wrote: > Tianon, could you please switch to docker-runc in docker.io? > > I have the packaging commits in git for docker-runc but I did not want to > push it to the go packages' area so when I get approved to the Docker >

[pkg-go] Bug#872807: Bug#872807: Bug#872807: Bug#872807: dh-make-golang: Please find dependencies based on Homepage, too

On 21 August 2017 at 14:11, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On 22 August 2017 at 01:17, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: >> Why not use the import path I so lovingly put in the generated control >> file for times like these? > > That's still missing from

[pkg-go] Bug#877146: Bug#877329: Bug#877146: update to runc (1.0.0~rc4) breaks docker

On 10 October 2017 at 12:59, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > I've been working on a "docker-containerd" package today (since that's > going to be useful regardless), and found that there are other > packages needed which depend on > "golang-github-opencon