Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-10 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 6:08 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > >> >> From the original warnings you sent I know I’ve fixed all except "I: i

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-10 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Michael Stapelberg > > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist > > wrote: >> >> From the original warnings you sent I know I’ve fixed all exc

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-08 Thread Michael Stapelberg
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:09 AM, Pete Heist wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg > wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. > > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary > and Go source code. This is a bit unusual: in Debian, we only pa

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-08 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. > > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary and > Go source code. This is a bit unusual: in Debian, we only package Go source > code to build other Go programs (

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-08 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:36 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Ok, I’m getting there, bear with me. :) In my case, would I not want to > produce both a binary package and eventually a source package? > > Be careful not to confuse the Debian concept of source packages (i.e. .dsc > files) and bin

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-07 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Sorry, only saw this email after my other reply. Somehow the threading broke, it seems. On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Pete Heist wrote: > > > On Feb 7, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Clément Hermann wrote: > > > > On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: > >> > >> Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not pub

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#888985: RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

2018-02-07 Thread Pete Heist
> On Feb 7, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Clément Hermann wrote: > > On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: >> >> Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a >> binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source >> package later when that’s ready? If you agree, could