Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

If you're impatient, I'm pretty sure recent enough docker builds with gccgo on arm64. On 14 October 2015 at 12:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > Hi tianon. I was curious what your plans were for uploading Go 1.5 to > unstable. Is there anything you can share?

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

On 16 October 2015 at 06:40, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> >> On 13 October 2015 at 16:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) >> wrote: >> > Hi tianon. I was curious what

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

Sure! :) On the Docker end, the discussion is in https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/15703 (and you're correct that it's Docker doing something "wrong", but isn't it still worth checking so we don't get random FTBFS? or do we just not worry about it and do something about them as they come?)

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

On 15 October 2015 at 10:40, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > FWIW, I don’t think that’s necessary for the compiler itself. Go adheres to > its Go 1 stability guarantee, and any package which breaks likely did > something wrong in the first place :). If this is the only thing

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 16:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) > wrote: > > Hi tianon. I was curious what your plans were for uploading Go 1.5 to > unstable. Is there anything you can share? > > Go

[pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

Hi tianon. I was curious what your plans were for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable. Is there anything you can share? I’m pretty keen on seeing Docker running on arm64 which should get pulled in as golang-go is a B-D. Thanks, Tim. ___