On 09/09/15 06:31, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any
> attention. A newer version of
> gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug.
Is check.v1 not good? AFAIR, gocheck is for the older API
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:31:25AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any
> attention. A newer version of
> gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug.
>
> Could someone please review and
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:38:18PM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 03:31:25AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> > Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any
> > attention. A newer version of
> > gocheck is required for bugsnag, and
Hi everyone. I filed bug #785772 in May but it hasn’t received any attention.
A newer version of
gocheck is required for bugsnag, and this update also closes another bug.
Could someone please review and upload?
Thanks,
Tim.
___
Pkg-go-maintainers
