Re: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Clément Hermann wrote: > On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: > > > > Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a > > binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source > > package later when that’s

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote: > > Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a > binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source > package later when that’s ready? If you agree, could you suggest a > simple, current binary package hosted on github

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > Thanks for contributing this package. Not at all, thank you kindly for patience with my complete newness to this! > The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary and > Go source

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: irtt/0.9-1 [ITP] (#888985)

Thanks for contributing this package. The resulting binary package irtt_0.9-1_amd64.deb contains both a binary and Go source code. This is a bit unusual: in Debian, we only package Go source code to build other Go programs (not for developers). Hence, we usually provide either a binary package