[pkg-go] Bug#792498: Bug#792498: prometheus.postinst: adduser: not found

2015-07-16 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 15/07/15 14:43, Jakub Wilk wrote: Package: prometheus Version: 0.14.0+ds-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy §3.5 Thanks for reporting! I have just commited the fix to Git and will upload soon. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go

[pkg-go] Bug#792105: Bug#792105: prometheus: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /var/lib/prometheus/console{, _libraries}/*

2015-07-16 Thread Martín Ferrari
they can't be owned by the package, and if they are conffiles, the user will be hassled with every upgrade (and deleted files restored)... I will try to find a solution and upload a fix asap. Any recommendations are welcomed! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho

[pkg-go] Bug#792105: Bug#792105: Bug#792105: prometheus: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /var/lib/prometheus/console{, _libraries}/*

2015-07-16 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 16/07/15 13:59, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2015-07-16 13:22, Martín Ferrari wrote: Thanks for reporting. I have been thinking about a good way to solve this, but still did not arrive to any good solution. These files are examples to be used as an starting point for the user to build

[pkg-go] Bug#792053: Bug#792053: Bug#792053: Bug#792053: prometheus: FTBFS w/ test suite errors

2015-07-12 Thread Martín Ferrari
in the compiler, as this seems it could be related to undefined behaviour when casting to unsigned values (the upstream bug has more details). -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

[pkg-go] Bug#792053: Bug#792053: Bug#792053: prometheus: FTBFS w/ test suite errors

2015-07-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
upstream to see if they know what can be causing this. Thanks again. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#792053: Bug#792053: prometheus: FTBFS w/ test suite errors

2015-07-10 Thread Martín Ferrari
instances of expected 1, got 0. I will get some 32 bit machine and take a look. Thanks for reporting! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[pkg-go] Bug#796838: Bug#796838: golang-snappy-go-dev and golang-github-golang-snappy-dev: error when trying to install together

2015-08-24 Thread Martín Ferrari
keep that one, but it would be good to create transitional packages and to sync maintainer stuff. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[pkg-go] Bug#792053: Bug#792053: prometheus: FTBFS w/ test suite errors

2015-08-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
release was not because of this bug, but since I had already prepared it, and it included the fix to this bug, I just lumped all together. Thanks for the report! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#797622: Bug#797622: prometheus-pushgateway: please make the build reproducible

2015-09-01 Thread Martín Ferrari
uild system. Once applied, prometheus-pushgateway can be built > reproducibly in our reproducible toolchain. heh, I had committed a similar patch last week (although I missed the hostname problem). Now I have a good excuse for uploading again! Thanks!

[pkg-go] Bug#796806: fix pending upload

2015-09-03 Thread Martín Ferrari
So, I can reliably reproduce this if I run the build with nice and have some processes eating the cpu away. I have added the information to the upstream bug, but in the meantime I am uploading a new release that just disables these tests. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho

[pkg-go] Updated pkg-go post-receive hook

2015-09-08 Thread Martín Ferrari
with the new script, or if you feel strongly against the new functionality, please let me know. Tincho. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin

Re: [pkg-go] BTS best practice

2015-09-08 Thread Martín Ferrari
hat for policy > queues. The changes I did yesterday to the post-receive git hook supposedly should already mark a bug as pending the moment the change is pushed. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.

[pkg-go] Bug#778629: New version was uploaded

2015-09-01 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 01/09/15 18:51, Alexandre Viau wrote: > Hello Martin, > > I think this was fixed by 0.0~git20150526-2 > > Do you agree? > > Should we close this or do you need a newer version? I have already closed it in my previouos mail :) -- M

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: New upstream version of golang-gocheck (Closes #785772)

2015-09-09 Thread Martín Ferrari
API only. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Various problems with packages in the group

2015-09-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
wanted > to change the team policy document on that before accepting the PR, > but I think we all agree by now. I have not noticed that was being discussed. But you can assume my +1 on that PR, obviously :) -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#798649: Bug#798649: golang-golang-x-net-dev: new upstream release?

2015-09-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
leases, I patched upstream and made an orig.tar.gz from that, but I should have made a Debian patch instead. > Also, could you take a stab at this bug please and package a new snapshot? Sure, I will look into it later today or tomorrow. -- Martín Fer

[pkg-go] Bug#799169: ITP: golint -- Linter for Go source code

2015-09-16 Thread Martín Ferrari
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Martín Ferrari" <tin...@debian.org> * Package name: golint Version : 0.0+git20150623.7b7f436 Upstream Author : The Go Authors * URL : https://github.com/golang/lint * License : BSD-3-Clause Prog

Re: [pkg-go] golang-uuid --> golang-github-pborman-uuid

2015-09-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
is in a saner state :) -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] golang-uuid --> golang-github-pborman-uuid

2015-09-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 11/09/15 12:59, Martín Ferrari wrote: > We currently have this package in packages/golang-uuid.git, whereas > there is a golang-github-pborman-uuid.git that never got uploaded > because of the duplication. This is pretty confusing. > > I am going to remove the latter, and re

Re: [pkg-go] Various problems with packages in the group

2015-09-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
ate orig.tar but only because `uscan` can not > generate orig.tar from checkout. For repackaging, what I do instead is to keep an upstream branch that follows upstream git history, and from there create a 'repackaged' branch that has all the needed removals. It has some work when merging in an extra ve

Re: [pkg-go] Various problems with packages in the group

2015-09-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
make it easier for them to work on packages, and for DDs to sponsor them. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-25 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 25/05/16 10:11, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support > again? Looks good. Now, I still haven't delved into this. How could I test it? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___

[pkg-go] Missing golang-x-net commits

2016-06-14 Thread Martín Ferrari
04:48:27 -0600 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
; introduced (if any). :)) Actually, please don't. All of the team's work depends on dh-golang, so uploading without proper testing is definitely *not ok*. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.deb

[pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
Built-Using is to be used: > https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-built-using: Thanks for the clarification. I am always confused by this field. Maybe we should do a mass-fix of this. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-main

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
Using field in control.. > > Because it was used on arch-all -dev package shipping sources... Sorry about that, I got it now. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-19 Thread Martín Ferrari
util_2.1.orig.tar.gz upstream/2.1 I also fixed some tests that fail, and various bits. I am just confused as to why you removed the Build-Using field in control.. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Grafana

2016-06-23 Thread Martín Ferrari
in working on it. In particular, I have been experiencing some crashes that have been fixed upstream, and there is a big release available too. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-23 Thread Martín Ferrari
Cool that you can do it so easy in cgit. How about Gitg for a change? > I don't usually inspect commits using web interface to git... Actually, the link he posted is equivalent to doing "git log debian/", which is also what I do to filter upstream commits for contributor

[pkg-go] Bug#814227: Bug#814227: prometheus-node-exporter: Wrong upstream version 0.12.0

2016-02-10 Thread Martín Ferrari
n deb source does specify 0.12.0rc1. You are completely right. Sadly I only realised this after uploading, and fixing it would require some version number hacking.. I was waiting for the final 0.12.0 to be released, but since that is taking a while, I should try to fix this someh

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

2016-02-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
again, sorry for being this late to the conversation, but I hope we can discuss this approach for a next version. Tincho. [1]: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-perl/packages/libmemcached-libmemcached-perl.git/commit/?id=e780b94 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

2016-02-07 Thread Martín Ferrari
some people, I think the notes about changelog handling would be a good addition. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) diff --git a/packaging.asciidoc b/packaging.asciidoc index 4b402f0..e473079 100644 --- a/packaging.asciidoc +++ b/packaging.asciidoc @@ -11,16 +11,25 @@ All Go packages are team-maintain

Re: [pkg-go] Fwd: Updating the pkg-go Team Maintenance policy

2016-02-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 09/02/16 01:44, Alexandre Viau wrote: > Hello, > > On 08/02/16 12:49 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> Although I presume this change might not be acceptable for some people, >> I think the notes about changelog handling would be a good addition. > > +1, I agree with

[pkg-go] Bug#817403: Bug#817403: prometheus: config reload for sysv init script

2016-03-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
Thanks for the patch! I am preparing version 0.17.0, and will include this with the upload. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [pkg-go] Asking upstream to tag repositories

2016-03-29 Thread Martín Ferrari
ssed a couple of months ago? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#819452: Bug#819452: golang-fsnotify: FTBFS, not working at all in ppc64el

2016-03-28 Thread Martín Ferrari
ot be affected if you remove fsnotify. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Build failures in arch:all packages (Was Bug#819452: golang-fsnotify: FTBFS, not working at all in ppc64el)

2016-03-30 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 28/03/16 19:16, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > > I filed today the bug referenced below, and got me thinking about the > wider issue of having hundreds of arch:all packages which might not be > working at all on certain architectures, waiting for some arch:any > pa

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-05 Thread Martín Ferrari
urceful upload? As a final note, I would like to point out that maybe not only golang libraries need to be taken into account. For example, prometheus -as it is compiled upstream- embeds javascript libraries into the binary. I have removed that in the Debian package, to have run-time 'linki

[pkg-go] RFC: Sprint

2016-03-27 Thread Martín Ferrari
gathering? Is any of you planning on going to the camp? Would you consider going if we organised a proper sprint? Cheers, Tincho. [0] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianEvents/Europe/2016/DSC -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#818580: ITP: golang-github-prometheus-client-model -- data model artifacts for Prometheus

2016-03-22 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 23/03/16 01:36, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 1:17:27 AM AEDT Martín Ferrari wrote: >> Well, now we have two versions of the same thing in the repository, >> which will need to be maintained separately. We could have instead fixed >>

[pkg-go] Bug#818580: ITP: golang-github-prometheus-client-model -- data model artifacts for Prometheus

2016-03-22 Thread Martín Ferrari
. Please, be more careful, otherwise it is the team that will have to pick up the pieces of all this. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#819214: (no subject)

2016-04-04 Thread Martín Ferrari
reopen 819214 severity 819214 important forwarded 819214 https://github.com/onsi/ginkgo/issues/247 thanks Hi, You are right, this needs to be properly addressed. I have reopened the bug with a lower severity (as the build is succeeding now), and created a bug upstream.

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Martín Ferrari
release, so then you can go into ~ -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Asking upstream to tag repositories

2016-04-02 Thread Martín Ferrari
ldb/issues/140 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#819452: golang-fsnotify: FTBFS, not working at all in ppc64el

2016-03-28 Thread Martín Ferrari
Source: golang-fsnotify Version: 1.2.9-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream As I reported upstream (https://github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify/issues/130), fsnotify does not seem to work at all in ppc64el. I noticed this when trying to solve a FTBFS in prometheus, that can be tracked down to this

Re: [pkg-go] fsnotify

2016-04-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
ndards-Version to 3.9.8 (though Lintian hasn't caught up yet), and > perhaps update Vcs-Git to > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-go/packages/golang-fsnotify.git > too. :-) Will do, although I am not sure if i will have any free time before monday (weekend away). So feel

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#822925: golang-github-gorilla-context: Please update to latest upstream snapshot

2016-04-29 Thread Martín Ferrari
tool for team work. But needs conventions to be followed, like not setting the distribution to unstable until the package is ready for upload, and stuff like that. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainer

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
is ever happen? I'm asking because upstream has now (finally) > disabled these tests so we should probably package a new upstream > snapshot instead/as well. I see the patch in git, but it is not in the archive. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#822746: golang: Add golang-any dependency package to install either golang-go or gccgo

2016-04-27 Thread Martín Ferrari
pends: golang-any" suffices in providing the default > Go compiler for each architecture. I was not aware of this discussion, but it seems like a great idea! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lis

[pkg-go] Bug#822932: Bug#822932: golang-golang-x-net-dev: please update to latest upstream snapshot

2016-05-01 Thread Martín Ferrari
ing gets broken. Please, let's keep repos consitent internally, otherwise it is a big mess. To tidy this up, I will need to rewrite a bit of history, so please, reset your repos. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg

[pkg-go] Bug#822395: Bug#822395: prometheus: FTBFS: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

2016-04-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
ib/go/src/golang.org/x/sys/unix (from $GOROOT) >> >> /<>/prometheus-0.18.0+ds/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/src/golang.org/x/sys/unix >> (from $GOPATH) This is actually a bug in fsnotify, introduced by me :) The dependency is present in build-depends, but not in the "b

[pkg-go] Bug#822395: Bug#822395: prometheus: FTBFS: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

2016-04-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 26/04/16 18:48, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> [2016-04-26 18:42]: >>>> src/gopkg.in/fsnotify.v1/inotify.go:19:2: cannot find package >>>> "golang.org/x/sys/unix" in any of: >>>>

[pkg-go] Bug#822700: Bug#822700: golang-github-spf13-viper: FTBFS: inotify.go:19:2: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

2016-04-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
tes. Thanks for reporting! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#822471: Bug#822471: ships with broken default configuration

2016-04-26 Thread Martín Ferrari
ise it. I will upload a fix asap. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] debcheckout runc

2016-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 20/05/16 13:40, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Geert, > > On 19/05/16 22:18, Geert Stappers wrote: > >> Here a report that `debcheckout runc` failed for me. >> I think it will fail for others too, hence this report. > > This looks like a problem with the script in ali

[pkg-go] Bug#824842: Bug#824842: prometheus: let systemd wait longer for graceful stop

2016-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
wait up to one minute. Care to send a patch? I don't use systemd, so I have no clue about it :) -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
s to be recompiled to be tested anyway. Actually, the idea is to test the *installed* package. So IMO the best is to just get the import-path and run go test with the GOPATH set as you suggest. I tried this locally and works perfectly. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _

Re: [pkg-go] debcheckout runc

2016-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
alioth admins on IRC -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] dh-make-golang has not entered testing even though the delay is over

2016-05-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 19/05/16 22:49, Geert Stappers wrote: >> I will check if a rebuild can be triggered, > > Please do. ( consider that as sending a cross for a 'done' ) I did not get a reply. So, let's just upload again. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) __

[pkg-go] Bug#824842: Bug#824842: Bug#824842: prometheus: let systemd wait longer for graceful stop

2016-05-23 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 22/05/16 11:17, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 01:37:12PM +0100, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> Makes sense. For sysvinit I am making it wait almost 20 seconds, and >> after that the action just fails (instead of SIGKILLing it). If systemd >> does not have

[pkg-go] Bug#825030: Bug#825030: dh-golang: backport to jessie

2016-05-23 Thread Martín Ferrari
rent version of dh-golang to jessie? I was actually waiting for 1.17 to reach testing to backport it, as I need it for other packages too. Will upload today. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alio

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
d just patch those tests out (// +build ignore, I guess) > instead... Yes. I think that go packages should pass tests as installed. If they don't, we should fix them -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-08 Thread Martín Ferrari
y levels, not really. You have: normal, verbose, and quiet mode. Personally, I think this is valuable output, and one can just use DH_VERBOSE=0 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://l

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-12 Thread Martín Ferrari
s have other names (fixtures is a common one). I think it is a bad idea to add this. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-15 Thread Martín Ferrari
lay a debug message when copying files to the build tree. -- Martín Ferrari <tin...@debian.org> Mon, 16 May 2016 01:08:06 +0100 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian

Re: [pkg-go] dh-make-golang has not entered testing even though the delay is over

2016-05-18 Thread Martín Ferrari
t was uploaded when dh-golang was broken (1.14). I will check if a rebuild can be triggered, otherwise we need to upload again. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-12 Thread Martín Ferrari
that could be removed if this was added > (in fact, maybe they would now cause errors or misbehave, which is > perhaps an argument against this change without some compat stuff...) Yes, that can only be added with a new compat level... Not too sure it is worth it

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-14 Thread Martín Ferrari
Since nobody has voiced strong concerns about this, I will merge this change later today or tomorrow and upload. I wanted to wait for Michael S. to chime in, but I guess he's not strongly opposed either :-) On 08/05/16 05:31, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just pushed

Re: [pkg-go] Backport for golang-1.6 and dh-golang-1.12

2016-05-04 Thread Martín Ferrari
ckports), and I think it is probably the most sensible way forward. I also get some tooling benefits: gbp will know automatically which pbuilder to use, if you say dist=dep14 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg

[pkg-go] Bug#823170: golang-testify: Vendors code without attribution

2016-05-01 Thread Martín Ferrari
Source: golang-testify Severity: serious Justification: Policy 12.5 This package is embedding source code for three other distributions without attribution in debian/copyright: vendor/github.com/davecgh/go-spew vendor/github.com/pmezard/go-difflib vendor/github.com/stretchr/objx -- System

Re: [pkg-go] DEP-14 and backports for prometheus and docker.io

2016-05-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
here > more specific in mind), so I think "master" still fits appropriately > (and is still in line with DEP-14). Actually, under dep-14 it should be debian/master :) -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maint

Re: [pkg-go] DEP-14

2016-05-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
like it" is not a great argument, but I am open for convincing if you make a good case. In any case, as I said many times before, I would like the team to adopt a unique standard, but we are pretty far from that. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___

[pkg-go] Bug#814227: Bug#814227: Bug#814227: prometheus-node-exporter: Wrong upstream version 0.12.0

2016-05-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
ncies, so it might still take a few days. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] DEP-14

2016-05-06 Thread Martín Ferrari
> the job done. Since this is a team, we need to find what is best for the group as a whole, not only for you. In any case, GBP is more or less the de-facto standard nowadays, and helps save a lot of time. I don't really see why you think it is a time waster for you. -- Martín Ferrari (Tinch

Re: [pkg-go] Package renames for clockwork and go-semver packages

2016-05-10 Thread Martín Ferrari
> other renames I would like to know more about this.. I dislike transitional packages, but I thought there was no alternative! -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://list

[pkg-go] contributors.debian.org source for pkg-go

2016-04-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
should review and possibly remove them. [1] https://contributors.debian.org/source/Go%20packaging%20group [2] http://paste.debian.net/439726/ -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

2016-04-14 Thread Martín Ferrari
an) packages installed the (go) packages that were actually used during > the build instead. > > As a bonus, this is shorter and arguably simpler that what it replaces. Just one comment. Shouldn't the build-using also include all build-dependencies, not only the golang ones? -- M

Re: [pkg-go] contributors.debian.org source for pkg-go

2016-04-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
decide what to delete. > Some of those repositories are obviously work-in-progress for existing or to- > be-submitted ITPs. Most of these repos are yours actually. I was not too sure about the work-in-progress, as they don't have a single commit... Hence my

[pkg-go] fsnotify

2016-04-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
API, and is consistent with other packages using gopkg (yaml, check). What do you guys think? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-07 Thread Martín Ferrari
ata/client.cer -> build/src/github.com/prometheus/prometheus/retrieval/testdata/client.cer Symlink /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com -> build/src/code.google.com Symlink /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/asaskevich -> build/src/github.com/asaskevich Thoughts? -- Martín Fer

[pkg-go] Bug#831863: Bug#831863: Bug#831863: monkeytail, mtail: both ship /usr/bin/mtail

2016-07-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 21/07/16 19:35, Martyn Smith wrote: > To be honest, I don't even know how to go about doing it. > > If you could file it that'd be great! The simplest way is to run reportbug "ftp.debian.org" and follow the instructions. I can do it for you :) -- Mar

[pkg-go] Bug#832834: Can't reproduce

2016-08-14 Thread Martín Ferrari
severity 832834 normal thanks Since there are no news on this, I am downgrading the bug for the time being, as it is threatening to remove a few rdeps from testing. I still want to solve the issue, but I can't do anything until it is reproducible. On 08/08/16 13:24, Martín Ferrari wrote: > t

Re: [pkg-go] go binary-only package

2016-07-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
but these are also usually easy to fix. You can also just create a new branch on each relase, and run your repack script. In both cases, you can tag that branch as upstream/1.2.3+ds, and generate an orig.tar.gz from there. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___

[pkg-go] Bug#831724: Bug#831724: mtail: FTBFS on non-amd64: go test -race unsupported

2016-07-18 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 18/07/16 19:19, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > go test: -race and -msan are only supported on linux/amd64, freebsd/amd64, > darwin/amd64 and windows/amd64 > Could you please arrange to skip this test for these architectures? Thanks for the report, I had no idea! Will fix ASAP. -- Martí

[pkg-go] Bug#831863: Bug#831863: monkeytail, mtail: both ship /usr/bin/mtail

2016-07-20 Thread Martín Ferrari
ame time, I wonder if monkeytail is going to stay around. The upstream project has vanished, and the last release was 8 years ago. Martyn, could you give your opinion on this? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintain

[pkg-go] Bug#830936: Bug#830936: prometheus-alertmanager: FTBFS on arm64: dispatch_test.go:132: received batch to[o] early

2016-07-13 Thread Martín Ferrari
then went away. It seems the test is flaky. I will report upstream. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-07 Thread Martín Ferrari
oblematic, but not sure we can do anything about it at this point. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-09 Thread Martín Ferrari
ive with that, although I know I will do any work needed to prepare security fixes for the few apps I maintain. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-10 Thread Martín Ferrari
when a rdep has a security fix. I know it is not ideal, but also it does not prevent us from providing proper support, IMHO. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.ali

Re: [pkg-go] Please upload golang-github-miekg-pkcs11 (0.0~git20160412.0.994d290-2)

2016-07-04 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 03/07/16 13:52, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi everyone. Could someone please upload the latest version of > golang-github-miekg-pkcs11 from the pkg-go repository? I've applied a > patch to close a reproducible build issue. Done! -- Martín Ferrar

[pkg-go] Bug#832834: Can't reproduce

2016-08-08 Thread Martín Ferrari
this package and update the bug report? Thanks. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-19 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 20/06/16 00:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > Built-Using only makes sense for a package that ships binaries. I really never knew if it should be present or not on -dev libraries.. But we have it is most of our repos nowadays. -- Martín Ferrari (Tin

[pkg-go] Bug#834494: RM: golang-github-prometheus-log-dev -- ROM; Superceded upstream

2016-08-16 Thread Martín Ferrari
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Upstream has just retired this package as it is now completely replaced by golang-github-prometheus-log. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-02-03 Thread Martín Ferrari
github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local 288.359s > ... > ___ > Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list > Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers > -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho)

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-31 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 31/01/17 13:01, Julien Cristau wrote: > On 01/28/2017 08:24 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> On 28/01/17 16:10, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> >>> AFAIK the buildds are building one package at a time, >> >> Uhm, don't know about that, but I many times I have experience

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-28 Thread Martín Ferrari
re-run the tests with /usr/bin/time on abel and see how much memory do they take. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-28 Thread Martín Ferrari
ock (2680815616 in use) fatal error: out of memory Yesterday I'd asked for a give back, since in the previous attempt the tests timed out. I can't reproduce this on the abel porterbox, and it seems to me like a problem of a very busy buildd more than any bug in the package. -- Martín

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-28 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 28/01/17 16:24, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> and the machines where prometheus failed have 4 GB RAM. > > abel too... Now it fails on abel too.. I guess it was always too close to the limit, and anything else running killed it. >> "2680815616 in use", that is 2.6

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-29 Thread Martín Ferrari
a lot! [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=prometheus=armhf [2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852959 -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http

[pkg-go] Bug#852959: Bug#852959: Bug#852959: prometheus FTBFS on armhf: github.com/prometheus/prometheus/storage/local fails

2017-01-29 Thread Martín Ferrari
solve than daily broken > compiles. Also, I think this might be more about addressable user space, because it is not the OOM killer, but the go runtime that kills the tests. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mail

  1   2   3   >