golang-google-cloud_0.0~git20160615-6_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
golang-google-cloud_0.0~git20160615-6.dsc
golang-google-cloud_0.0~git20160615-6.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:05:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#838754: fixed in golang-google-grpc 1.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #838754,
regarding golang-google-grpc: please make the build reproducible
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 19 Nov 2016 06:05:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#844074: fixed in golang-google-cloud 0.0~git20160615-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #844074,
regarding golang-google-cloud: FTBFS (use of internal package not allowed)
golang-goprotobuf_0.0~git20161116.0.224aaba-2_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
golang-goprotobuf_0.0~git20161116.0.224aaba-2.dsc
golang-goprotobuf_0.0~git20161116.0.224aaba-2.debian.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Source: golang-github-xenolf-lego
Version: 0.3.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 05:37:50 +
Source: golang-goprotobuf
Binary: golang-goprotobuf-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0~git20161116.0.224aaba-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: pkg-go
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 05:43:11 +
Source: golang-google-cloud
Binary: golang-google-cloud-dev golang-google-cloud-compute-metadata-dev
Architecture: source
Version: 0.0~git20160615-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency:
Source: golang-github-tideland-golib
Version: 4.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: prometheus-alertmanager
Version: 0.3.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: golang-google-cloud
Version: 0.0~git20160615-5
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gitlab-ci-multi-runner
Version: 1.7.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part
Source: ratt
Version: 0.0~git20150816.0.b060319-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:41:07 +0900
Source: golang-github-nsf-termbox-go
Binary: golang-github-nsf-termbox-go-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.0~git20160914-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer:
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 15:09:11 +1100
Source: golang-github-dnephin-cobra
Binary: golang-github-dnephin-cobra-dev
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.1+git20160809.0.8e4c18b-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Glad to hear it’s useful :).
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 4:37 AM, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) <
timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote:
> On 17 Nov 2016, at 6:20 PM, Michael Stapelberg
> wrote
>
> > As for the issue itself, could you please file a bug at
>
15 matches
Mail list logo