On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Michael Stapelberg
stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
I’ve uploaded oglematchers now. Will take a look at the rest later/this
weekend.
Cool, thank you!
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Michael Stapelberg
stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
I’ve spent a bit of time analyzing the dependencies and came up with the
graph you can find attached. There are two leaf packages that can be
immediately tackled, the rest will require tackling the
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Michael Stapelberg
stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
Indeed. Currently, when building, I get:
# github.com/googlecloudplatform/gcsfuse/fs
src/github.com/googlecloudplatform/gcsfuse/fs/fs.go:203: cannot use fs (type
*fileSystem) as type fuseutil.FileSystem in
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Michael Stapelberg
stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
As I tried to explain before, we cannot use your vendored copies, and the
tarballs we’ll create of your source code will not even contain the vendor/
directory.
Sorry, I had totally forgotten that you said this.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org
Could the timing requirements be relaxed to make it less flaky?
Sure. Are you able to modify the test before running it on the relevant system
and find a timing that works reliably?
I don’t think giving up is a good
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Michael Stapelberg
stapelb...@debian.org wrote:
All dependencies are now in Debian. gcsfuse itself doesn’t build in version
0.2.0 (latest release at the time of writing). I think it’ll need