Le 14 octobre 2016 13:33:53 GMT+02:00, "Clément Hermann" <nod...@nodens.org> a
>Le 14/10/2016 à 12:34, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> A few of these dependencies are already in the archi
Ooops. Sent using my work address, please use this one instead (but I'm
subscribed on both list so don't CC me if you reply on-list). Sorry for
On 13/10/2017 13:36, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Hi !
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:00:33 +0100 Evgeni Golov <evg...@debian.org&g
while looking into LXD dependancies packaging (see #768073), I noticed
- the upstream code of golang-github-tendermint-log15-dev is a fork of
github.com/inconshreveable/log15 (we need this for lxd, and I'm about
Time for a status update on this one, hopefully !
On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:36:47 +0200 Clément Hermann
> I see there are only a couple dependancies left on the wiki page. Do you
> need help ?
> I'm not a Go expert, but I would real
On 03/12/2017 17:37, Clément Hermann wrote:
> On 21/11/2017 12:48, Clément Hermann wrote:
>> When I wanted to build the package, I realized it's not using
>> git-buildpackage, as the other Go packages do.
>> Is it intentional, or do you plan to use graft or someth
On 03/12/2017 23:39, Clément Hermann wrote:
> I just uploaded my fixes and pushed the missing branches/tags.
> All it needs now is rewiewing, signed tag and upload, hopefully.
I first did that, but discussion with Tincho and Jonathan on IRC made me
reset the repo complet
On 17/12/2017 16:40, Clément Hermann wrote:
> Hi !
> On 03/12/2017 23:39, Clément Hermann wrote:
>> I just uploaded my fixes and pushed the missing branches/tags.
>> All it needs now is rewiewing, signed tag and upload, hopefully.
Time for a new status update, I guess.
On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote:
> So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2
> (#839748), since I had no answer.
> It should be fit
[wrong CC address... Sorry, need more sleep !]
On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 18:45:21 +0100 wrote:
> Hi !
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:30:00 +0100 Jonathan Dowland
> > This is a dependency for LXD and is being packaged via the pkg-go team.
On 21/11/2017 12:48, Clément Hermann wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017 18:45:21 +0100 <clement.herm...@virtua.ch> wrote:
>> Hi !
>> On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 15:30:00 +0100 Jonathan Dowland <j...@debian.org>
>>> This is a dependency for LXD and i
* Package name: golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2
Version : 0.0~git20171109.99ba61b-1
Upstream Author : LXC - Linux Containers
* URL : https://github.com/lxc/go-lxc
Control: close 839748
On 28/12/2017 17:13, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:00:17 +0000, Clément Hermann wrote:
>> Format: 1.8
>> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 19:33:18 +0100
>> Source: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.v3
>> Binary: golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2.
On 10/01/2018 03:41, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> On 08/01/18 08:24 PM, Julian Gilbey wrote:
>> However, the lists.alioth.debian.org list is due to be shut down in
>> three weeks' time (on 2018-02-01) as announced in
>> so what
The last missing dependency for LXD should be ready to upload,
hopefully. If a DD could have a look at it and upload it that would be
Martín, maybe preferably you since you already had a first look at it ?
I've resumed active work on LXD, the last dependency
(golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc.v2 - #883488) is almost done (pending review
Regarding lxc-go, I suggest we archive the previous attemps, since it
will live in pkg-go repository (using gitlab Archive feature on Salsa).
Same for the
On 07/02/2018 08:49, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> I don’t mind having the compiler packages in the go-team.
> Hypothetically, can we set ACLs on subgroups? If so, we should have
> go-team/packages (already exists) and go-team/compiler, with the option
> to maybe ACL go-team/compiler differently
On 07/02/2018 11:39, Pete Heist wrote:
> Ah, ok. IRTT has an API, but it's not published yet. I think a
> binary-only package may be better at this point, and a separate source
> package later when that’s ready? If you agree, could you suggest a
> simple, current binary package hosted on github
On 15/02/2018 13:26, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, I think I now agree with the rationale.
> When building packages, we must honor DH_GOLANG_EXCLUDES, so it doesn’t
> make sense to have the source files in the package.
> The next step is making sure that we
On 17/12/2017 21:39, Clément Hermann wrote:
> On 04/12/2017 21:40, Clément Hermann wrote:
>> So, I did some work on golang-gopkg-flosch-pongo2
>> (#839748), since I had no answer.
I'm newly joined to the team, packaging some dependancies for LXD 
While working on golang-gopkg-lxc-go-lxc, Martin (Tincho) pointed to me
that I should exclude examples from source - which surprised me, because
I thought I did. But indeed, I misread the man page , which
during Perl Team last LHF session, I tried to put together a list of
what's here, and what's needed to move to Salsa.
While it is specific to the perl team, it should be a good starting
point for our own work I guess
Disclaimer: most of the useful input comes from Gregoa, credits
Ping / reminder about this RFC - since I didn't get any feedback ;)
On 21/12/2017 21:05, Clément Hermann wrote:
> I'm newly joined to the team, packaging some dependancies for LXD 
> While working on golang-gopkg-lxc-go-l
On 05/04/2018 23:22, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 05/04/18 15:31, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> I’ll not be able to attend in person.
>> I’d be happy to review any material you come up with for the talk,
>> though :).
>> In case there’ll be another BoF like last year, I’d like to participate
Mail list logo