Re: [pkg-go] Changing dh-golang to work with Go shared libraries

2015-06-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
to maintaining that feature. Oh yes, definitely. We'd also need golang-shared-dev (or whatever that ends up being called) in experimental too, and that's not going to happen for a little while... Cheers, mwh On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote

Re: [pkg-go] Proposal: extending package names to always be fully specified

2015-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This all makes sense to me, at least (less thinking == better). Will you update http://pkg-go.alioth.debian.org/packaging.html soon? Cheers, mwh On 10 June 2015 at 21:40, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org wrote: Hey, this was discussed a while ago in the #debian-golang IRC channel:

[pkg-go] Bug#796761: golang-golang-x-tools: please upload a new snapshot

2015-08-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: golang-golang-x-tools Version: 1:0.0~git20150716.0.87156cb+dfsg1-3 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, Currently golang-golang-x-tools has tests that fail with Go 1.5. These have been fixed in tip. There are other tests that I think will fail on some builder unless -short is passed to

Re: [pkg-go] dh-golang : DH_GOLANG_INSTALL_EXTRA_EXTENSIONS option

2015-07-30 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
) } // … } Did I miss something? No indeed -- it would be an improvement on just collecting .go files, but not a total solution. Cheers, mwh On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle michael.hud...@canonical.com wrote: I guess you could ask go by invoking 'go list -json

[pkg-go] Bug#794815: Bug#794815: FTBFS because go generate is missing a build dependency... and then some.

2015-08-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 7 August 2015 at 08:41, Hilko Bengen ben...@debian.org wrote: Source: golang-x-text Version: 0+git20150518.c93e7c9-1 Severity: grave Beacuse dh-golang now executes go generate, the stringer binary is needed in building: , | ... | src/golang.org/x/text/width/trieval.go |

[pkg-go] anything I should know about before uploading go 1.5rc1 for ubuntu?

2015-08-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, I'm planning on uploading Go 1.5 rc 1 to Ubuntu wily soon (before feature freeze, which is August 20). I'd like to avoid a gratuitous delta with Debian, so I've based my work on https://github.com/tianon/debian-golang/pull/1. The changes I've made are in

[pkg-go] Bug#793829:

2015-07-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
@@ +gocode (20150303-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix packaging stuff. + + -- Michael Hudson-Doyle mwhudson@glamdring Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:57:38 + + gocode (20150303-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Remove vim-syntax-go from vim-gocomplete dependency list (Closes: #786891) diff -Nru gocode

[pkg-go] Bug#793829: gocode: fails to build with Go 1.5

2015-07-27 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: gocode Version: 20150303-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The package fails to build with Go 1.5 because debian/rules appears to think make is shell and sets GOPATH to '`pwd`'. Go 1.5 is stricter about detecting bogus GOPATH values and the build fails. The fix is to remove chunks of

Re: [pkg-go] Limiting number of "link" instances -- how?

2015-11-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I don't think you can currently -- you need to pass -p 1 to the go install command, but dh-golang doesn't let you do that currently. Maybe it should! Cheers, mwh On 13 November 2015 at 05:15, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Hi team, > > My system cripples when I build heavy Golang

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

2015-10-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
If you're impatient, I'm pretty sure recent enough docker builds with gccgo on arm64. On 14 October 2015 at 12:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) wrote: > Hi tianon. I was curious what your plans were for uploading Go 1.5 to > unstable. Is there anything you can share?

Re: [pkg-go] Recommended packages in golang-go binary

2015-10-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I definitely would expect cgo to work by default. On 7 October 2015 at 04:25, Tianon Gravi wrote: > I put them in recommends because without them, trying to use cgo is likely > to explode, but I'd be open to arguments against how common cgo really is in > practice. :) > > -

[pkg-go] Building the race detector runtime support from source

2015-10-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi there, It was pointed out during the review of my Go 1.5 package for Ubuntu that the current go packaging includes files for race detector support that is not built from source included in the source package, so I made a package that does build them from source (basically it turns the

Re: [pkg-go] Plans for uploading Go 1.5 to unstable?

2015-10-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 16 October 2015 at 06:40, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Tianon Gravi wrote: >> >> On 13 October 2015 at 16:43, Potter, Tim (Converged Cloud) >> wrote: >> > Hi tianon. I was curious what

Re: [pkg-go] Thoughts on the golang-go package for arm64?

2015-09-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 11 September 2015 at 11:00, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 10 Sep 2015, at 7:41 am, Michael Hudson-Doyle > <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> arm64 support is new in 1.5, which afaik isn't in debian yet. It can >&g

Re: [pkg-go] Thoughts on the golang-go package for arm64?

2015-09-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
arm64 support is new in 1.5, which afaik isn't in debian yet. It can be bootstrapped with gccgo, which is what we did for Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/wily/+source/golang (based on stuff that Tianon and Paul did). Cheers, mwh On 9 September 2015 at 19:10, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services)

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

2016-05-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 26 May 2016 at 06:34, Peter Colberg <pe...@colberg.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 08:10:34PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Thanks. Can you upload? > > Sorry, I don’t have upload privileges :-(. > > My application for DM is pending: > > https:/

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15 June 2016 at 17:40, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 9:55:34 AM AEST Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Where can I get docker.io_1.11.1~ds1.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz} ? > > ?? Is something wrong with "uscan"? > > Y

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15 June 2016 at 20:36, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 8:26:43 PM AEST Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Ah, good point. Fix for that push to the bug-827219 branch, tested >> with docker with reasonable-seeming results. Merge to

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15 June 2016 at 19:57, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 4:19:59 PM AEST Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Oh, sorry, I see that the failure is when building something that >> depends on golang-google-cloud. I don't have time to test it now,

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I guess it would be better to feed the source files rather than the directory to dpkg-source. On 14 June 2016 at 08:36, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Package: dh-golang > Version: 1.17 > Severity: normal > Control: affects -1 docker.io > > dh_golang invocation fails on

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
While this bug report makes sense, I can't reproduce the problem. Does it only fail on some version of golang-google-cloud in git that you haven't pushed to alioth or something? I'll try to code up a fix but it would be nice to test that it actually helps.

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oh, sorry, I see that the failure is when building something that depends on golang-google-cloud. I don't have time to test it now, but I have pushed a proposed fix to https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/dh-golang.git/log/?h=bug-827219. I'd be interested to hear if it helps!

[pkg-go] Bug#827226: Bug#827226: incorrect preparation of build directory when pre-installed package is re-built

2016-06-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 14 June 2016 at 10:11, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Package: dh-golang > Version: 1.17 > Severity: normal > > --buildsystem=golang does a nice job preparing build directory in > `dh_auto_configure` by symlinking source packages from under > "/usr/share/gocode/src" to directory

[pkg-go] Bug#827219: Bug#827219: dh-golang: Built-Using calculation crashes on "golang-google-cloud"

2016-06-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15 June 2016 at 02:00, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for looking into the problem. > > On Tuesday, 14 June 2016 3:45:35 PM AEST Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> While this bug report makes sense, I can't reproduce the problem. D

Re: [pkg-go] build-dependency loop: golang-github-coreos-pkg and golang-github-coreos-go-systemd

2016-06-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 21 June 2016 at 17:57, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 5:02:19 PM AEST Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Currently in sid golang-github-coreos-pkg and >> golang-github-coreos-go-systemd Build-Depend on each other. This is an &

[pkg-go] Bug#827928: Bug#827928: golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev: circular dependency with golang-github-coreos-pkg-dev

2016-06-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Indeed, I ran into this too: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-go-maintainers/Week-of-Mon-20160620/005631.html and https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/issues/183 and https://github.com/coreos/pkg/issues/73. The good news is that upstream seem to agree this is a problem... On 23 June

[pkg-go] build-dependency loop: golang-github-coreos-pkg and golang-github-coreos-go-systemd

2016-06-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, Currently in sid golang-github-coreos-pkg and golang-github-coreos-go-systemd Build-Depend on each other. This is an accurate reflection of the upstream situation (github.com/coreos/pkg/capnslog/journald_formatter imports github.com/coreos/go-systemd/journal,

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Isolating the packaging changes is hardly difficult: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-shirou-gopsutil.git/log/debian On 24 June 2016 at 05:52, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 6:32:46 PM AEST Martín Ferrari wrote: >> On 20/06/16

Re: [pkg-go] golang 1.6... basically ready for upload

2016-02-22 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Mostly away from email so please excuse lateness, brevity, top-posting etc. 1) for Ubuntu we're carrying a patch from IBM that contains their port to s390x. I don't know if you guys want to pick that up too. 2) a change to debian/rules' clean target is needed: a generated file has moved from

[pkg-go] Bug#818320: golang-golang-x-tools: FTBFS with go 1.6

2016-03-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Source: golang-golang-x-tools Version: 1:0.0~git20151026.0.0f9d71c-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: Policy 4.9 Dear Maintainer, The version of golang/x/tools in the archive currently fails tests with Go 1.6 and fails to build. Updating to a new upstream snapshot should fix this.

[pkg-go] Bug#818320: golang-golang-x-tools: FTBFS with go 1.6

2016-03-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
) Cheers, mwh On 16 March 2016 at 10:51, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > Source: golang-golang-x-tools > Version: 1:0.0~git20151026.0.0f9d71c-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Justification: Policy 4.9 > > Dear Maintainer, > &

Re: [pkg-go] [pkg-golang-devel] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 April 2016 at 17:07, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12 April 2016 at 21:39, Michael Hudson-Doyle > <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >> We could do it without 1) and the consequent re-uploading of every go >> library by using dpkg-query --sea

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 April 2016 at 17:03, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > * Michael Hudson-Doyle: > >> There is another approach to the static linking issue, which is to >> start using dynamic linking instead. It's implemented upstream for >> most architectures no

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Bit of a late reply, been busy. On 5 April 2016 at 19:27, Florian Weimer wrote: > Hi, > > we need to discuss how we can support applications written in Go for > stretch. > > The most radical approach would be not to ship any Go applications in > stretch, only the basic Go

[pkg-go] Bug#818551: Bug#818551: golang-golang-x-tools: provides same file '/usr/bin/bundle' as ruby-bundler

2016-03-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Oops, pushed a fix to git, will need Tianon or someone to upload. On 18 March 2016 at 11:32, Sven Hartge wrote: > Package: golang-golang-x-tools > Version: 1:0.0~git20160315.0.f42ec61-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 10.1 > > Hi! > > The subject says it all: > >

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: Update to golang-yaml.v2 for golang 1.6

2016-04-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > Hah, I was just doing exactly this. I was about to run ratt > (https://people.debian.org/~stapelberg//2015/10/12/ratt.html) on my > changes but I'll run it on yours instead and let you know how it goes > :-) > > Cheers, &

Re: [pkg-go] [pkg-golang-devel] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
some tooling which addresses the issue in a > sufficient way. > > I’d suggest to tackle the problem the same way for Go, and maybe share some > tools if applicable. That said, I won’t have time or motivation to do any of > the work required for this, so volunteers are very welcome. >

[pkg-go] Bug#822395: Bug#822395: Bug#822395: Bug#822395: prometheus: FTBFS: cannot find package "golang.org/x/sys/unix"

2016-04-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 27 April 2016 at 10:57, Tianon Gravi <tia...@debian.org> wrote: > On 26 April 2016 at 15:46, Michael Hudson-Doyle > <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >> Could/should dh_golang provide help for getting this right? It's kinda >> similar to the work I did rec

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 5 April 2016 at 11:10, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow it > to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch. According to the > github issue tracker it's a known problem with

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 20 May 2016 at 16:24, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > Somehow I don't have Martín's original mail... > > On 5 April 2016 at 15:40, Dmitry Smirnov <only...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Thursday, 31 March 2016 1:59:14 AM AEST Martín Ferrari wro

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 20 May 2016 at 16:24, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > > Yeah, I didn't know this automatic test control file thing was > possible! That's cool. I think a go one only needs to run something > like: > > GOPATH=/usr/share/gocode go test

[pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

2016-05-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, For some reason or other, Ubuntu builds don't have a tty and debian builds do. golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt failed tests in this situation, so I fixed this upstream: https://github.com/erikdubbelboer/gspt/pull/6 and pushed the new upstream snapshot to git.debian.org. Can someone

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

2016-05-23 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks for the feedback, all done in git. (I always forget that sbuild doesn't run lintian on the source package!) Cheers, mwh On 21 May 2016 at 15:56, Peter Colberg <pe...@colberg.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:11:30PM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wro

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 21/05/2016 7:33 am, "Martín Ferrari" <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > > On 20/05/16 05:24, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > Somehow I don't have Martín's original mail... > > Here it is: > https://www.mail-archive.com/pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 8 May 2016 at 16:31, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > > I have just pushed a branch (tincho_extensions) to dh-golang, > implementing a few changes that I believe are beneficial for golang > packaging. If there are no objections, I would like to merge this to > master and

[pkg-go] recording the go import path in a golang-*-dev binary package's control fields

2016-05-08 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, I recently was trying to figure out from a binary package name (e.g. golang-yaml.v2-dev) the import path corresponding for the package (in this case, "gopkg.in/yaml.v2"). I couldn't find any easy way (what I did in the end was look for the top most directories the package installed .go

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 9 May 2016 at 13:23, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 09/05/16 02:12, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> (parenthetically, as I think I said on IRC, dh-golang should just copy >> testdata by default) > > I agree, but so far I don't know how

Re: [pkg-go] RFC: Enhancements to dh-golang

2016-05-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 May 2016 at 00:52, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 11/05/16 03:57, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> +} elsif ($File::Find::name =~ m%/testdata/%) { >> +# testdata directories are always copied > > Ah yes, but that is c

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

2016-04-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15/04/2016 10:48 am, "Tianon Gravi" wrote: > > On 14 April 2016 at 15:46, Tianon Gravi wrote: > > I think this block is why that latest upload is causing everything to > > fail to build -- we removed GOPATH from "sub build", but didn't add > >

Re: [pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

2016-04-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 15 April 2016 at 03:55, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 14/04/16 01:43, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Built-Using for a binary is meant to include all packages that are included >> in >> the binary itself, but using Build-Depends only pulls in the dir

[pkg-go] [PATCH] Compute Built-Using with go list, not Build-Depends

2016-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Built-Using for a binary is meant to include all packages that are included in the binary itself, but using Build-Depends only pulls in the direct dependencies. Use go list and dpkg-query --search instead to find out which (debian) packages installed the (go) packages that were actually used

Re: [pkg-go] [pkg-golang-devel] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-04-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 April 2016 at 21:05, Michael Hudson-Doyle <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 13 April 2016 at 17:07, Tianon Gravi <admwig...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12 April 2016 at 21:39, Michael Hudson-Doyle >> <michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: >>> We

Re: [pkg-go] autopkgtest

2016-05-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
OK. Reload https://github.com/mwhudson/autodep8/compare/master...go-support again? Cheers, mwh On 22 May 2016 at 14:51, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 20/05/16 22:35, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> It won't work for debian packages that have go packag

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: new upstream snapshot golang-github-erikdubbelboer-gspt

2016-05-25 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 25 May 2016 at 04:50, Peter Colberg <pe...@colberg.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:12:24AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback, all done in git. (I always forget that sbuild >> doesn't run lintian on the source package!) > > Than

[pkg-go] Bug#827928: Bug#827928: Bug#827928: golang-github-coreos-go-systemd-dev: circular dependency with golang-github-coreos-pkg-dev

2016-08-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks to upstream changes we can fix this by packaging golang-github-coreos-pkg-capnslog separately from the rest of golang-github-coreos-pkg. It's a bit of a hack, it'd be better to wait until upstream splits out capnslog into a separate repo but that seems to be taking a while. I'll do this in

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 13 July 2016 at 19:20, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:12:05AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> On 8 July 2016 at 20:03, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) >> <timothy.pot...@hpe.com> wrote: >> > On 7 Jul 20

Re: [pkg-go] go binary-only package

2016-07-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 21 July 2016 at 07:39, Erick Cardona wrote: > Hi Tim and thanks! > > I'm just using a random upstream repository(github) and trying to package it > using the Debian tools. Actually dh-make-golang does all the magic and now > I'm able to create the .deb with the

[pkg-go] Any interest in these packages for Debian?

2016-07-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Hi all, We (as in Canonical) are in the process of packaging some Go libraries in Ubuntu. We're doing this because they are dependencies of packages that we do not intend to maintain in Debian, and so it doesn't seem that there's much benefit to maintaining the dependencies in Debian either.

Re: [pkg-go] [pkg-golang-devel] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 10 July 2016 at 07:39, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Dmitry Smirnov: > >> On Friday, 8 July 2016 8:53:20 AM AEST Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Part of the problem is that we currently lack a decent way to list all >>> these reverse dependencies. >> >> We can get list of all source

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 9 July 2016 at 07:21, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: >> > On Wednesday, 6 July 2016 9:59:32 PM AEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> >> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to what >> >> was >> >> discussed in April? The freeze is

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-07-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 8 July 2016 at 20:03, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > On 7 Jul 2016, at 12:40 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> >> On 06/07/16 20:59, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: >> >>> What's the current status? Is there technical progress compared to what was >>>

[pkg-go] Bug#829302: dh-golang: Respect "--parallel" and "--max-parallel" options

2016-07-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I haven't tried it properly, but does this not limit the parallelism and slow builds by default? (I don't know how this works and apparently have not got around to reading up on it in the week since the bug was filed, so I'll ask a potentially silly question) On 2 July 2016 at 22:37, Dmitry

[pkg-go] Bug#828985: Bug#828985: golang-github-gosimple-slug: FTBFS: FAIL: TestSubstituteLang (0.00s) slug_test.go:155: 1. Substitute("o a o", map[string]string{"o":"no", "a":"or"}) = "no nor no"; wan

2016-06-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Seems like an upstream problem, I filed https://github.com/gosimple/slug/issues/8 On 30 June 2016 at 02:28, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: golang-github-gosimple-slug > Version: 1.0-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > User:

[pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Built-Using only makes sense for a package that ships binaries. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#827697: Bug#827697: Bug#827697: golang-github-shirou-gopsutil: Please update to latest release

2016-06-19 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
..@tincho.org> wrote: > On 20/06/16 00:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: >> Built-Using only makes sense for a package that ships binaries. > > I really never knew if it should be present or not on -dev libraries.. > But we have it is most of our repos nowadays.

Re: [pkg-go] Strange build failure on ppc64 only

2017-01-29 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 29 January 2017 at 03:25, Sascha Steinbiss wrote: > Hi all, > > I have noticed that the ppc64 build for a Go package I co-maintain failed > [1] with the following error message: > > […] > go build github.com/google/stenographer/blockfile: no buildable Go source > files in

[pkg-go] Bug#843787: Bug#843787: golang-github-jacobsa-crypto-dev: hash_64bit.go misses ppc64(el)

2016-11-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
I made a PR: https://github.com/jacobsa/crypto/pull/7 On 10 November 2016 at 05:10, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Package: golang-github-jacobsa-crypto-dev > Version: 0.0~git20160410.0.42daa9d-2 > Severity: important > > Builds of gocryptfs on ppc64el and the non-release architecure

[pkg-go] Bug#843787: Bug#843787: Bug#843787: golang-github-jacobsa-crypto-dev: hash_64bit.go misses ppc64(el)

2016-11-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
That PR got merged, so an upstream update will fix this (I can't do that, only a DM still :-p) On 10 November 2016 at 08:06, Michael Hudson-Doyle < michael.hud...@canonical.com> wrote: > I made a PR: https://github.com/jacobsa/crypto/pull/7 > > On 10 November 2016 at 05:10

Re: [pkg-go] golang-golang-x-tools not migrating to testing, why?

2016-11-01 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 2 November 2016 at 15:23, Martín Ferrari <tin...@tincho.org> wrote: > On 02/11/16 01:26, Martín Ferrari wrote: > > On 02/11/16 00:05, Martín Ferrari wrote: > >> On 01/11/16 21:44, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > >> > >>> Go 1.6 did that too, but the

[pkg-go] Bug#842897: Bug#842897: fix test failure with gccgo

2016-11-02 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This looks like an upstream problem, have you reported in there? It looks like a test depending on details of the function names you get from runtime.Stack or similar, probably just skipping it when running with gccgo would be fine. Cheers, mwh ___

Re: [pkg-go] Security support for packages written in Go

2016-10-11 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 12 October 2016 at 10:44, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:53:57AM +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > On 9 July 2016 at 07:21, Moritz Muehlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote: > > > Florian Weimer wrote: > > >> &

Re: [pkg-go] Sponsor uploads of golang-github-hlandau-{goutils, buildinfo, dexlogconfig}

2016-10-09 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 8 October 2016 at 09:46, Peter Colberg wrote: > Hi Martín, > > Thanks for the quick review. > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 12:51:14PM +0200, Martín Ferrari wrote: > > It is indeed peculiar, and I wonder what ftp-master will think of it. > > Tracking license info for each

Re: [pkg-go] Sponsor uploads of golang-github-hlandau-{goutils, buildinfo, dexlogconfig}

2016-10-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
;pe...@colberg.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:00:31AM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > > I don't know, but it's not surprising to me. The issue that is that > gccgo-6 > > does not install /usr/bin/go, rather it installs /usr/bin/go-6 (so you > can > >

Re: [pkg-go] restic package

2016-12-14 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
If the package doesn't build with "go install" but some other way, you're going to be fighting dh_golang a bit I think. On 13 December 2016 at 01:02, Félix Sipma wrote: > I forgot to add the debian/rules: > > #!/usr/bin/make -f > > export DH_OPTIONS > >

[pkg-go] Bug#848629: ITP: golang-gopkg-retry.v1 -- Simple retry mechanism for Go.

2016-12-18 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Michael Hudson-Doyle" <michael.hud...@ubuntu.com> * Package name: golang-gopkg-retry.v1 Version : 0.0~git20161025.0.c09f6b8-1 Upstream Author : Roger Peppe <rogpe...@gmail.com> * URL : http://gopkg

Re: [pkg-go] golang-google-cloud is marked for autoremoval from testing

2017-03-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
So the armhf failure here is a flaky test, now fixed upstream. For MIPS, I'm not sure what's going on, honestly I'm surprised it's ever built there, it's possible a few retries will make that work, or maybe we can just remove the binaries on MIPS and stop building there (unless someone cares).

[pkg-go] Bug#857025: Bug#857025: golang-golang-x-tools FRBFS on armhf: golang.org/x/tools/refactor/satisfy [no test files]

2017-03-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
The "no test files" thing is not the cause of the failure and the log link is a 404 for me. This link works though: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=golang-golang-x-tools=armhf=1%3A0.0~git20161028.0.b814a3b%2Bds-3%2Bb1=1488869926=0 and the failure is this: === RUN

Re: [pkg-go] Minutes for the DebConf17 BoF

2017-08-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 12 August 2017 at 08:01, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Pkg-go BoF meeting minutes > == > > On Tuesday, we had the first in-person meeting of the team. We met for 2 > hours to discuss our current issues and to plan for the future. > > People present >

[pkg-go] Bug#822743: dh-golang: should assist in calculating -dev packages Depends:

2017-06-20 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 20 June 2017 at 19:52, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi, > > currently going through the bugs of dh-golang. > > Is there anything that remains to be done here? Well, nothing at all has been done so far :-) OTOH it's a feature request so perhaps doing nothing is the

[pkg-go] Bug#872807: Bug#872807: Bug#872807: dh-make-golang: Please find dependencies based on Homepage, too

2017-08-21 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 22 August 2017 at 01:17, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > Why not use the import path I so lovingly put in the generated control > file for times like these? > That's still missing from heaps of packages, isn't it? I know someone who likes writing scripts to fix lots of golang

[pkg-go] Bug#876862:

2017-10-04 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
This is another of those "only happens on reproducible-builds" mysteries. It builds fine for me. Reducing severity to normal. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[pkg-go] Fwd: please consider naming the new section go, not golang

2017-11-15 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
-- Forwarded message -- From: Matthias Klose Date: 13 November 2017 at 23:39 Subject: Fwd: please consider naming the new section go, not golang To: Michael Hudson Forwarded Message Subject: please consider naming the new

Re: [pkg-go] moving to salsa.debian.org

2018-02-06 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 6 February 2018 at 13:25, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 2018-02-04 02:50 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:29 PM, Alexandre Viau wrote: > >> I don't think the advantages are worth renaming. It could create >> confusion. >> > What

[pkg-go] Accepted golang-github-go-redis-redis 6.9.2-2 (source) into unstable

2018-03-07 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Michael Hudson-Doyle <mwhud...@debian.org> Description: golang-github-go-redis-redis-dev - Type safe Redis client for Go Changes: golang-github-go-redis-redis (6.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * d/patches/fix-build-on-32-bi

Re: [pkg-go] moving to salsa.debian.org

2018-03-12 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
Thanks from me too! On 12 March 2018 at 21:59, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Sounds good. Thank you for your work on this! > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:20 PM, Alexandre Viau wrote: > >> On 2018-03-01 11:16 AM, Alexandre Viau wrote: >> > On 2018-03-01

Re: [pkg-go] moving to salsa.debian.org

2018-02-28 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 1 March 2018 at 10:12, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for moving this forward! > > On 27/02/18 21:10, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > > > dh-make-golang’s create-salsa-project subcommand now calls this logic > > via an HTTP request, so that we can update the