[pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Signature for changes file was already seen at 2018-02-15 15:06:31.600536. Please refresh the signature of the changes file if you want to upload it again. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Okay, now done. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Alexandre Viau wrote: > Ehh, my memory was wrong, I can't find anything about it either. > > Someone opened an ITP in the past, which I referred to the > already-existing package: > -

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Alexandre Viau
Ehh, my memory was wrong, I can't find anything about it either. Someone opened an ITP in the past, which I referred to the already-existing package:  - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807905 Maybe this is what I remembered. Feel free to re-upload and I won't interfere ;) On

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Michael Stapelberg
I did explicitly upload it, because we have a number of packages which depend on it, e.g. golang-github-gin-gonic-gin, nomad, etcd, golang-github-siddontang-ledisdb, packer, … What makes you say we don’t need it in the archive anymore? And why is there not a request for removal bug filed with the

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Thanks for clarifying! On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:23 PM, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi, > > > What email? I didn’t receive anything/didn’t see anything on the list. > > ftpmaster@ alias received: > > > Hello, > > > > golang-github-ugorji-go-codec shouldn't have been uploaded to

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Alexandre Viau
Sorry Michael! Was it you that re-uploaded it? I had requested that this package be removed a while ago, and re-uploaded it by mistake recently. My upload was a source upload so it didn't make it to new, but when I saw the NEW email I thought that somehow I uploaded the binary package by

[pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Thorsten Alteholz
as requested by email === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Michael Stapelberg
What email? I didn’t receive anything/didn’t see anything on the list. On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz < ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> wrote: > > as requested by email > > > > === > > Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why > your files were

[pkg-go] golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

2018-02-15 Thread Debian FTP Masters
golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a-2.dsc: Refers to non-existing file 'golang-github-ugorji-go-codec_1.1+git20171228.f2ec36a.orig.tar.xz' Perhaps you need to include the file in your upload? === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your