On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:48:02PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> I meet this FTBFS either.
> After looking at the code, I think it's caused by this test only waits
> 5s for writing 134M data.
> So I changed the time to 180s which I think sufficient for most disks.
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/
And Santiago, Lucas,
Could you help to test and see if it still FTBFS?
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 11:48 PM, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> I meet this FTBFS either.
> After looking at the code, I think it's caused by this test only waits
> 5s for writing 134M data.
> So I changed the time to 180s which I th
I meet this FTBFS either.
After looking at the code, I think it's caused by this test only waits
5s for writing 134M data.
So I changed the time to 180s which I think sufficient for most disks.
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-go/packages/golang-github-boltdb-bolt.git/commit/?id=e989709
Since t
Source: golang-github-boltdb-bolt
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20160728 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully)