On 5 April 2016 at 11:10, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
wrote:
> Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow it
> to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch. According to the
> github issue tracker it's a known problem with
On 5 Apr 2016, at 12:48 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 1:35:28 AM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
> wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry. I'm only removing one of the tests out of this file - about 40
>> lines out of 320 so a bit over 10%. I thought that would
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 1:35:28 AM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry. I'm only removing one of the tests out of this file - about 40
> lines out of 320 so a bit over 10%. I thought that would be OK.
Of course it is OK. I didn't realise that you are removing just a
On 5 Apr 2016, at 10:01 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
> On Monday, 4 April 2016 11:10:51 PM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
> wrote:
>> Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow
>> it to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch.
On Monday, 4 April 2016 11:10:51 PM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
wrote:
> Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow
> it to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch. According to
> the github issue tracker it's a known problem with Go 1.5 and