Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-26 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On 5 April 2016 at 11:10, Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow it > to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch. According to the > github issue tracker it's a known problem with

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-04 Thread Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
On 5 Apr 2016, at 12:48 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 1:35:28 AM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) > wrote: >> Hi Dmitry. I'm only removing one of the tests out of this file - about 40 >> lines out of 320 so a bit over 10%. I thought that would

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-04 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 1:35:28 AM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi Dmitry. I'm only removing one of the tests out of this file - about 40 > lines out of 320 so a bit over 10%. I thought that would be OK. Of course it is OK. I didn't realise that you are removing just a

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-04 Thread Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support)
On 5 Apr 2016, at 10:01 AM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Monday, 4 April 2016 11:10:51 PM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) > wrote: >> Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow >> it to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch.

Re: [pkg-go] RFS: golang-protobuf-extensions patch to disable failing test

2016-04-04 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
On Monday, 4 April 2016 11:10:51 PM AEST Potter, Tim (HPE Linux Support) wrote: > Hi again. I've made a small patch to golang-protobuf-extensions to allow > it to be built under the version of Go currently in stretch. According to > the github issue tracker it's a known problem with Go 1.5 and