Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-27 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tuesday 25 October 2016 06:10 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/10/16 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >>> I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for >>> good, and in that case will need to create

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-25 Thread Martín Ferrari
Hi, On 25/10/16 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for >> good, and in that case will need to create a new package with a API >> version embedded. > > What do you

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for > good, and in that case will need to create a new package with a API > version embedded. What do you think the best here now? I have to fix

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-12 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 11/10/16 21:39, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 11 octobre 2016 19:06 CEST, Martín Ferrari : > > I'm really sorry and I will revert the change and work on the other > dependencies. Yeah, sorry does not cut it. How the hell are you now going to fix this

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 11 octobre 2016 19:06 CEST, Martín Ferrari  : I'm really sorry and I will revert the change and work on the other dependencies. >>> >>> Yeah, sorry does not cut it. How the hell are you now going to fix this >>> mess? >>> >> I will upload 3.0.0+REALLY.2.6.0-1 which

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ചൊവ്വ 11 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2016 10:36 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote: > OK, please do the same with both libraries, and revert any other changes > you have done. Reverted both packages to previous versions. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 11/10/16 19:04, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ചൊവ്വ 11 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2016 10:23 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> On 11/10/16 18:51, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> >>> I'm really sorry and I will revert the change and work on the other >>> dependencies. >> >> Yeah, sorry does not cut it. How the hell are you

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 11/10/16 18:51, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I'm really sorry and I will revert the change and work on the other > dependencies. Yeah, sorry does not cut it. How the hell are you now going to fix this mess? -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) ___

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING NOW. On 11/10/16 17:23, Pirate Praveen wrote: > I tested the reverse dependency. Its tests are passing with golang-go. I > uploaded both to experimental first before uploading to unstable. I > fixed one issue in experimental too. You only tested the one direct reverse

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2016-10-11 Thread Martín Ferrari
On 11/10/16 13:40, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > Accepted: > Source: golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go > Binary: golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go-dev > Architecture: source > Version: 3.0.0-3 This is pretty surprising! Have you check that this does not break reverse dependencies? I mentioned just a