Bug#895397: josm: fails to start

2018-04-11 Thread Vincent Privat
Hello,
It's a Java bug. It seems Netbeans faced it too:

https://netbeans.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271914

It's linked to multi-monitor setups. They advise to start the application
on another monitor (you have to clean your JOSM profile before doing that).

2018-04-11 8:55 GMT+02:00 Bas Couwenberg :

> Control: severity -1 important
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On 2018-04-11 08:09, patrick noll wrote:
>
>> JOSM fails when trying to launch from menu or cli and returns pop up
>> with following info:
>>
>
> I cannot reproduce this issue, josm works as expected on my system.
>
> Ensure that you have configured openjdk-9 as the default:
>
>  update-java-alternatives -s java-1.9.0-openjdk-amd64
>
> If the issue persists try starting josm with a clean profile:
>
>  JAVA_OPTS="-Djosm.home=${HOME}/.josm-new-home" josm
>
> If that works, there is probably a plugin, setting or other file in your
> JOSM directory that breaks the new version.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Bas
>
>
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#895311: josm: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when downloading data

2018-04-10 Thread Vincent Privat
Hello Vincent,
JOSM should display an error stacktrace in the bug report dialog. We need
it to investigate this issue, could you please copy/paste it here?
Cheers,
Vincent

2018-04-09 20:55 GMT+02:00 Vincent Smeets :

> Package: josm
> Version: 0.0.svn13576+dfsg-3
> Severity: important
>
> It is not possible to download any data.
>
> Reproduced by:
> - Start josm
> - Press the "Download data" button
> => An error dialog opens the reports that an unexpected exception
>occured.
>
> The log output reports the exception:
>   2018-04-09 20:43:39.391 SEVERE: Handled by bug report queue:
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()
> Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;
>   java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()
> Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;
>
> The full output with the stack trace is attached to this report.
>
> Regards
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: buster/sid
>   APT prefers testing
>   APT policy: (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
>
> Kernel: Linux 4.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=nl_NL.utf8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
> LANGUAGE=nl_NL.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
> Versions of packages josm depends on:
> ii  fonts-noto 20171026-2
> ii  jmapviewer 2.7+dfsg-1
> ii  libcommons-compress-java   1.13-1
> ii  libcommons-logging-java1.2-2
> ii  libgettext-commons-java0.9.6-6
> ii  liboauth-signpost-java 1.2.1.2-1.5
> ii  libsvgsalamander-java  1.1.1+dfsg-2
> ii  openjdk-9-jre [java9-runtime]  9.0.4+12-4
> ii  proj-data  5.0.1-1
>
> Versions of packages josm recommends:
> ii  josm-l10n  0.0.svn13576+dfsg-3
>
> josm suggests no packages.
>
> -- no debconf information
>
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#765421: jmapviewer: Download bing logo via attribution XML at runtime?

2014-10-21 Thread Vincent Privat
I made the 1.04 release especially for this bug :/
There are very few other changes: one bug fix, optimized PNGs and code now
requiring Java 7, but that should not be a problem:
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/log/subversion/applications/viewer/jmapviewer?action=stop_on_copymode=stop_on_copyrev=30760stop_rev=30424

I am also releasing a new tested version of JOSM right now (7643). It's a
bugfix release that addresses major problems present in version 7588, this
version is meant for Jessie if possible...

Didn't know Freeplane was using JMapViewer however, it's great to see we're
not alone to use it after all :)

2014-10-21 20:52 GMT+02:00 Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net:

 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl writes:

  Hi Felix,

 hello Bas,

  Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl writes:
  On 10/20/2014 11:17 PM, Felix Natter wrote:
  Felix Natter fnat...@gmx.net writes:
  = I think we need to investigate that for jessie+1, but now I think
  we
  should parse the attribution data and use the included link to
  download the logo at runtime (many thanks to the patch [1] from
 Marcus
  Lundblad m...@update.uu.se and Martin Krüger
  martin.krue...@gmx.com)?
  We should really agree on something now ;-)
 
  -- Can we all agree on this solution for jessie?
  (which is probably legal if JMapViewer itself is legal)
 
  I'd suggest to apply this patch now to make sure it's fixed for
 jessie!
 
  Yes, until we hear otherwise it seems to me the best solution to the
  Bing logo license problem.
 
  I've cleaned up the patch a little and added DEP3 headers for inclusion
  in the jmapviewer package. When the patch is forwarded upstream we have
  a nice opportunity to get the upstream point of view on this issue.
 
  Thanks for your help! I pushed the change to jmapviewer git and tested
  with josm (and freeplane).
 
  Do you intent to update the package with the 1.04 upstream release?
 
  JMapViewer 1.04 contains the patch in slightly modified form, more in
 line
  with the upstream coding convention.

 I would rather not like to do this, because i.e. from 1.02 to 1.03 they
 introduced incompatibilies and I had to fix freeplane, and I might
 not have enough time to fix freeplane (and josm) before the freeze :-/

  Don Armstrong wrote:
  At the very least, I'd stick a note in NEWS.Debian.gz.
 
  = Do we really want to do this? I think that problematic
  bing support is not quite new for this package?
 
  Documenting the problems with the Bing logo is a good idea in general.
 
  I'm inclined to document it in README.Debian instead of in a NEWS item,
  because the logo was never part of the package. But NEWS items are more
  visible thanks to apt-listchanges.

 Ok, I added your patch description to README.Debian.

  @Andreas: Could you sponsor this tomorrow?

 BTW: the git repo is here:
 http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/jmapviewer.git

  Would it make sense to sponsor the new upstream version instead of the
  patches 1.03?

 I appreciate that you reported the patch upstream so quickly, but I
 would prefer to stick with 1.03 for jessie.

 Thanks and Best Regards,
 --
 Felix Natter

 --
 To unsubscribe, send mail to 765421-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.

___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#765421: jmapviewer: Download bing logo via attribution XML at runtime?

2014-10-20 Thread Vincent Privat
On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:07:15 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl
wrote:

 I've cleaned up the patch a little and added DEP3 headers for inclusion
 in the jmapviewer package. When the patch is forwarded upstream we have
 a nice opportunity to get the upstream point of view on this issue.


Hi guys,
Upstream point of view is that we'll commit this patch and release a new
version of JMapViewer.

I'm think also to release a new stable version of JOSM ASAP. If we release
it before Friday, is there a chance this version makes it to Jessie?
It would fix some issues listed on your bugtracker. But do not forget to
update all packages at the same time (josm, josm-plugins, jmapviewer and
openstreetmap-map-icons-classic).

Regards,
Vincent, for the JOSM team
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Bug#765421: jmapviewer: Download bing logo via attribution XML at runtime?

2014-10-20 Thread Vincent Privat
Hi,
JMapViewer 1.04 has been released.
Vincent

2014-10-21 1:59 GMT+02:00 Vincent Privat vinc...@josm.openstreetmap.de:

 On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:07:15 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg 
 sebas...@xs4all.nl wrote:
 
  I've cleaned up the patch a little and added DEP3 headers for inclusion
  in the jmapviewer package. When the patch is forwarded upstream we have
  a nice opportunity to get the upstream point of view on this issue.
 

 Hi guys,
 Upstream point of view is that we'll commit this patch and release a new
 version of JMapViewer.

 I'm think also to release a new stable version of JOSM ASAP. If we release
 it before Friday, is there a chance this version makes it to Jessie?
 It would fix some issues listed on your bugtracker. But do not forget to
 update all packages at the same time (josm, josm-plugins, jmapviewer and
 openstreetmap-map-icons-classic).

 Regards,
 Vincent, for the JOSM team

___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel