Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Alexis, On 05/20/2016 11:29 AM, Alexis Bienvenüe wrote: > Le 20/05/2016 11:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : >> The second patches seems better because it doesn't rely on external ls >> which is not a given for the Windows builds. > > OK I see. > >> I don't understand the need for the

Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-20 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Le 20/05/2016 11:18, Sebastiaan Couwenberg a écrit : > The second patches seems better because it doesn't rely on external ls > which is not a given for the Windows builds. OK I see. > I don't understand the need for the buildit target, isn't it sufficient > to do the wildcard sorting in the

Processed: Re: Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #824808 [src:gdal] gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering) Added tag(s) pending. -- 824808: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824808 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with probl

Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-20 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 pending Hi Alexis, Thanks for the patches. On 05/20/2016 01:28 AM, Alexis Bienvenüe wrote: > Either one of the two attached patches fixes the order files are passed > to libtool — but I don't know if one of them could be an acceptable > solution. The second patches seems

Bug#824808: gdal: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-19 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: gdal Version: 2.1.0+dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed