Re: epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org wrote: This was actualla not a bad job. Sometimes this just happens and picking all the licenses is the boring part of packaging (but necessary for sure). For those who don't know it, a useful tool to check for licenses is 'licensecheck' Run it in your source directory. licensecheck --copyright -r . I've just committed fixes requested by the ftpmaster to git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api I hope you are still interested in sponsoring the package. Done Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, Il giorno Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:23:42 +0100 Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org ha scritto: On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:55:36PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote: I apologize for the bad job. This was actualla not a bad job. Sometimes this just happens and picking all the licenses is the boring part of packaging (but necessary for sure). I've just committed fixes requested by the ftpmaster to git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api I hope you are still interested in sponsoring the package. Done Andreas. thank you very much. Just a question, what is the correct procedure now? Should I reply to the ftpmaster email to notify the new upload Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. or it is not needed? ciao -- Antonio Valentino ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Andreas, Il giorno Mon, 14 Feb 2011 22:04:40 + Joerg Jaspert ftpmas...@debian.org ha scritto: Hi Maintainer, im sorry but I have to reject this package as there are files with (C)/license headers not mentioned. src/example contains BSD licensed files and they require explicitly to be mentioned. And while I am on it, you could take the second paragraph out of the long description of the package. It would never end up in main if it wouldn't be open source and as such the whole 2 lines are redundant. Good for the marketing buzz on the homepage of the software, but useless in Debian package descriptions. :) I apologize for the bad job. I've just committed fixes requested by the ftpmaster to git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/epr-api I hope you are still interested in sponsoring the package. regards -- Antonio Valentino ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
epr-api_2.2-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Hi Maintainer, im sorry but I have to reject this package as there are files with (C)/license headers not mentioned. src/example contains BSD licensed files and they require explicitly to be mentioned. And while I am on it, you could take the second paragraph out of the long description of the package. It would never end up in main if it wouldn't be open source and as such the whole 2 lines are redundant. Good for the marketing buzz on the homepage of the software, but useless in Debian package descriptions. :) -- bye Joerg === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
