[DebianGIS-dev] [SCM] saga branch, debian/2.0.5, updated. a7b2522df56961a9c92f40ec9cd364b4aa3294ff

2010-10-01 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
The following commit has been merged in the debian/2.0.5 branch: commit a7b2522df56961a9c92f40ec9cd364b4aa3294ff Author: Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com Date: Fri Oct 1 09:36:32 2010 +0200 Add otlv4 to copyright file diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright index

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598706: grass-dev should depend on libgdal1-dev

2010-10-01 Thread Hamish
Package: grass-dev Version: 6.4.0~rc6+42329-1 Severity: minor Hi, as reported on the UbuntuGIS mailing list, http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ubuntu/2010-September/000247.html building some GRASS addons fails because the grass-dev package does not depend on the libgdal1-dev package, only

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#589789: gpsdrive-scripts: geo-code should use /bin/bash

2010-10-01 Thread Hamish
as noted at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpsdrive/+bug/325288 {{{ the geo-code script was dropped in SVN almost 19 months ago. http://gpsdrive.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gpsdrive?view=revisionrevision=2204 closing upstream ticket as fixed. }}} the debian package is wildly

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#589789: Bug#589789: gpsdrive-scripts: geo-code should use /bin/bash

2010-10-01 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 11:41:47PM +1300, Hamish wrote: as noted at https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gpsdrive/+bug/325288 {{{ the geo-code script was dropped in SVN almost 19 months ago. http://gpsdrive.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gpsdrive?view=revisionrevision=2204 closing

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598706: Bug#598706: grass-dev should depend on libgdal1-dev

2010-10-01 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 10:43:15PM +1300, Hamish wrote: Package: grass-dev Version: 6.4.0~rc6+42329-1 Severity: minor Hi, as reported on the UbuntuGIS mailing list, http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ubuntu/2010-September/000247.html building some GRASS addons fails because the

[DebianGIS-dev] [SCM] saga branch, debian/2.0.5, updated. dd064edc74ccc05bdd5eef285a42b3106b48ba43

2010-10-01 Thread Johan Van de Wauw
The following commit has been merged in the debian/2.0.5 branch: commit dd064edc74ccc05bdd5eef285a42b3106b48ba43 Author: Johan Van de Wauw johan.vandew...@gmail.com Date: Fri Oct 1 16:05:48 2010 +0200 Add libhpdf-dev to build-dependencies Not strictly needed, but allows building of

[DebianGIS-dev] r2938 - packages/grass/trunk/debian

2010-10-01 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2010-10-01 14:46:25 + (Fri, 01 Oct 2010) New Revision: 2938 Modified: packages/grass/trunk/debian/changelog Log: Better changelog. Modified: packages/grass/trunk/debian/changelog === ---

[DebianGIS-dev] r2939 - packages/grass/trunk/debian

2010-10-01 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2010-10-01 15:28:20 + (Fri, 01 Oct 2010) New Revision: 2939 Modified: packages/grass/trunk/debian/rules Log: Avoid compressing AUTHORS file. Modified: packages/grass/trunk/debian/rules === ---

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Schaefer
Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 21:40 +0200 schrieb David Paleino: Hallo David Could you please post the output of: $ ldd /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/mapnik/_mapnik.so | grep icuu libicuuc.so.42 = not found libicuuc.so.44 = /usr/lib/libicuuc.so.44 (0x7f982e436000) Could

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Schaefer
Am Freitag, den 01.10.2010, 19:53 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: Hallo Julien Care to try again without the grep? linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7d3ea000) libmapnik.so.0.7 = /usr/local/lib/libmapnik.so.0.7 (0x7f88d4ed6000) libpng12.so.0 = /lib/libpng12.so.0

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Schaefer
Am Freitag, den 01.10.2010, 19:53 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau: Hallo Julien Care to try again without the grep? libmapnik.so.0.7 = /usr/local/lib/libmapnik.so.0.7 (0x7f88d4ed6000) This may cause the problem, an old mapnik installation from source which was not removed

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: [Fwd: Re: Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42]

2010-10-01 Thread Peter Schaefer
Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Peter Schaefer peter.schae...@kettwieseltandem.de Reply-to: peter.schae...@kettwieseltandem.de An: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Kopie: 598...@bugs.debian.org, da...@debian.org Betreff: Re: Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: [Fwd: Re: Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42]

2010-10-01 Thread Dane Springmeyer
On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Peter Schaefer wrote: Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Peter Schaefer peter.schae...@kettwieseltandem.de Reply-to: peter.schae...@kettwieseltandem.de An: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Kopie: 598...@bugs.debian.org, da...@debian.org Betreff:

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598652: marked as done (python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42)

2010-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:01:24 +0200 with message-id 20101001200124.gm10...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#598652: python-mapnik: Misssing shared library libicuuc.so.42 has caused the Debian Bug report #598652, regarding python-mapnik: Misssing shared library

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#598706: Bug#598706: grass-dev should depend on libgdal1-dev

2010-10-01 Thread Hamish
Francesco wrote: Well one rigourously does not need to depend on gdal/ogr stuff to build grass addons, but that could help. fwiw, a grep suggests the original poster was trying to install one of the r.stream.* addons. looking through the results of: $ cd /usr/lib/grass64/include/grass/ $ grep