[mapnik] 01/01: Release to unstable

2015-05-27 Thread Jérémy Lal
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

kapouer pushed a commit to branch master
in repository mapnik.

commit 781b98bc3c3b0556b1f19543cca301c2a59fba7a
Author: Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org
Date:   Wed May 27 21:13:35 2015 +0200

Release to unstable
---
 debian/changelog | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6d2100a..fd7d0bd 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-mapnik (3.0.0~rc3+ds-1) experimental; urgency=medium
+mapnik (3.0.0~rc3+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Imported Upstream version 3.0.0~rc3+ds
   * Python bindings are now in separate upstream project
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ mapnik (3.0.0~rc3+ds-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 + build new plugins: pgraster, topojson
   * Standards-Version 3.9.6
 
- -- Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org  Wed, 27 May 2015 18:22:19 +0200
+ -- Jérémy Lal kapo...@melix.org  Wed, 27 May 2015 21:13:32 +0200
 
 mapnik (2.2.0+ds1-7) unstable; urgency=medium
 

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on 
/srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-grass/mapnik.git

___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Re: [mapnik] 01/01: Release to unstable

2015-05-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 05/27/2015 09:53 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
 Release to unstable

Why did you decide to upload to unstable instead of experimental after all?

I don't think an upload to unstable is a good idea at this point.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Re: [mapnik] 01/01: Release to unstable

2015-05-27 Thread Jérémy Lal
2015-05-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl:

 On 05/27/2015 09:53 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:

  Release to unstable


 Why did you decide to upload to unstable instead of experimental after all?


 I don't think an upload to unstable is a good idea at this point.


 Kind Regards,


 Bas


Since we have a major soname bump, this new version won't replace the old
one
right away. Packages depending on version 2.2 will still work and won't be
broken.
Only rebuilds against latest libmapnik-dev 3.0.0 will.

I figured that and went for unstable. Mind that version 3.0.0-rc3 is as
close to final
version as it can get - there is actually nothing experimental in either
upstream
version, nor debian packaging. The only experience is seeing how it will
build on
other platforms.

If you prefer, you can also block migration to testing with a bug.

Jérémy
___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel

Re: [mapnik] 01/01: Release to unstable

2015-05-27 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Jérémy,

Thanks for the quick feedback.

On 05/27/2015 10:18 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
 2015-05-27 22:08 GMT+02:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl:
 
 On 05/27/2015 09:53 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:

 Release to unstable


 Why did you decide to upload to unstable instead of experimental after all?


 I don't think an upload to unstable is a good idea at this point.


 Kind Regards,


 Bas

 
 Since we have a major soname bump, this new version won't replace the old
 one
 right away. Packages depending on version 2.2 will still work and won't be
 broken.
 Only rebuilds against latest libmapnik-dev 3.0.0 will.
 
 I figured that and went for unstable. Mind that version 3.0.0-rc3 is as
 close to final
 version as it can get - there is actually nothing experimental in either
 upstream
 version, nor debian packaging. The only experience is seeing how it will
 build on
 other platforms.
 
 If you prefer, you can also block migration to testing with a bug.

To better evaluate the impact I whipped up a quick transition tracker,
and the number of affected reverse dependencies is much more limited
than I thought.

http://linuxminded.nl/tmp/pkg-grass-transitions/html/mapnik.html

The mapnik update only affects mapnik-vector-tile, monav  node-mapnik,
so it's not much of an issue after all.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

___
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel