Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Christoph Egger
Package: src:gdal Version: 1.9.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-gdal_1.9.0-2+b1-amd64-8y0tnm/gdal-1.9.0/swig/ruby'

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby; would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths? /bin/bash /build/buildd-gdal_1.9.0-2+b1-kfreebsd-i386-sJevbb/gdal-1.9.0/libtool --mode=compile --tag=CXX g++ -g -O2 -Wall -fPIC -DPIC

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby; would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths? Yep. The problem is that the calls to ruby with the package ruby

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
tags 675972 + patch thanks Hi, On 04/06/12 21:14, Vincent Fourmond wrote: I've checked that it works changing from ruby to ruby1.8. You probably should try to use ruby1.9.1-dev at a later date. I'm not the maintainer, I was just asking. Thanks a lot for the help! Not tested this myself yet;

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: On 04/06/12 21:14, Vincent Fourmond wrote: I've checked that it works changing from ruby to ruby1.8. You probably should try to use ruby1.9.1-dev at a later date. I'm not the maintainer, I was just asking.  Thanks a

Processed: Re: Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 675972 + patch Bug #675972 [src:gdal] gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675972:

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 20:18:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Hi, Does gdal need an explicit Build-Depends: ruby1.8 instead of ruby; would that cause the buildscripts to pick the right include paths? I'd rather suggest removing gdal's ruby packages. They have no reverse deps in the

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 22:33:42 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: As far as I can tell, the package doesn't contain ruby scripts, only bindings. Dependencies will need to make sure ruby1.8 is used, though. (but there isn't ;-)...). Users will have to take care. That's entirely unacceptable.

Bug#675972: gdal: FTBFS: fatal error: ruby.h: No such file or directory

2012-06-04 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 04/06/12 21:42, Julien Cristau wrote: I'd rather suggest removing gdal's ruby packages. They have no reverse deps in the archive anyway. So if I understand this right, gdal only produces bindings for ruby1.8, which Ruby maintainers want to remove for Wheezy+1 anyway, and no packages in