Your message dated Fri, 31 Jul 2015 23:20:44 +0200
with message-id <20150731212043.ga32...@geggus.net>
and subject line Re: sfcgal: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not as expected
has caused the Debian Bug report #793924,
regarding sfcgal: FTBFS on non-amd64: symbols not as expected
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
793924: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793924
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sfcgal
Version: 1.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Builds of sfcgal for architectures other than amd64 have all failed
with symbol mismatches, as detailed at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=sfcgal&ver=1.1.0-1
(It's possible that kfreebsd-amd64 would fare better.)
Could you please take a look, and account for this variation?
Thanks!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
fixed 793924 sfcgal/1.1.0-2
thanks
Hi,
The recent sfcgal (1.1.0-2) upload to unstable fixes this issue.
Regards
Sven
--
# Turn on/off security. Off is currently the default
(found in MongoDB default configfile)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Pkg-grass-devel mailing list
Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
