On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 01:13:33PM +0100, Antonio Valentino wrote:
The upstream code seems to be deeply re-organized with respect to v 1.8
so I wonder if it make sense to try to update (maybe in a branch) the
current openev package [3] (I should contact the author) or if it is
better to create
Il giorno sab, 29/01/2011 alle 20.00 +0100, Antonio Valentino ha
scritto:
Anyway, IMHO, if openev is considered no more useful it should be
removed from the ToDO list.
You are right; I did not check the list since a long time. Is anybody
following ti? May I go ahead and editing it?
All the
Hi Paolo,
Il giorno Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:11:26 +0100
Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it ha scritto:
Are we sure OpenEV is still useful, given the progresses of other
packages?
Well, I think that openev has a valuable asynchronous painting engine
that can be useful in case of very large
3 matches
Mail list logo
