On 05/10/2014 09:55 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:31:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Maybe just importing the fixed tarball as upstream version 1.11.0+dfsg+1?
>
> Unfortunately we need to introduce a new ad hoc upstream version such
> as that you sugges
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:31:15PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I've seen different tarballs for the same upstream version on
> snapshot.d.o, but AFAIK ftp-master rejects source uploads when the
> checksum and/or size doesn't match the orig.tar.gz previously uploaded.
>
> Maybe just impor
On 05/07/2014 10:28 AM, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>> Bas, that tarball for unknown reason missed the .gitignore file originally
>> included in previous version and present in master/experimental tree.
>> That causes git-
On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:27:37PM +, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
>
> sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch pristine-tar
> in repository gdal.
>
> from 3b8f65d pristine-tar data for gdal_1.10.1+dfsg.orig.tar.gz
>
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:27:37PM +, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
> >
> > sebastic-guest pushed a change to branch pristine-tar
> > in repository gdal.
> >
> Bas, that tarball for unknown reason missed the .gitignore file originally
> included in previous version and present in master/experimental tree.
> That causes git-buildpackage to fail. I also used your uploaded tarball
> with the same result.
This happened before, see the history of the upstre
6 matches
Mail list logo
