Re: postgis backport
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oh, I didn't know about this repository. I guess there is no need for a backport then... Regards, Le 09/05/2014 14:39, Markus Wanner a écrit : > [ Using pkg-postgresql-public mailing list, instead of lots of CCs. > ] > > On 05/09/2014 01:11 PM, Pierre Rudloff wrote: >> Would you be OK to add postgis 2 to wheezy-backports? You can see >> the package on mentors: >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/postgis The only dependency >> that would need to be backported too is postgresql-common: >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/postgresql-common > > Are you aware that there already is a backport to wheezy served by > pgapt [0] ? > > I generally recommend that to Postgres users, as it supports > multiple major versions - independent of their status in testing. > > But I'm not opposing a wheezy backport of postgis, either. It's > known working on wheezy, so feel free... > > Regards > > Markus Wanner > > [0]: pgapt, the PGDG apt repository: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTbNO6AAoJEJOz9THuJtIawCAH/0Hn+z49z4A1gVeABcAzavlu GMS70CkvT5sDO55TrIPyWgL5UDJx+fqWArGGkiq9J0iI5bYXvlb5rzy1j8LUDFPM YDI+gLkHYy2U27OQp/DLPTXffp2r4mOGCbGLa3q7RdzwJiUMMu2BKtY2tfgiydzt og/gPYK/UDjmPHLpYfF2DTVhMnqpjvKXJghjX8nrepugdMNS4II6et/MTuUggyo3 oLHXDrrDAAvtaDbTUweBN+D7g8W80PKuBuBflsYzX7ja+OGqbPVKQRJb0qhgglix SRYqaBSkl+3P+0DZ3XK5+FD146ySrOhCJmVx037TgJspKdUR4vSZLANjP8FKvuc= =Dzhn -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: postgis backport
[ Using pkg-postgresql-public mailing list, instead of lots of CCs. ] On 05/09/2014 01:11 PM, Pierre Rudloff wrote: > Would you be OK to add postgis 2 to wheezy-backports? You can see the > package on mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/postgis > The only dependency that would need to be backported too is > postgresql-common: http://mentors.debian.net/package/postgresql-common Are you aware that there already is a backport to wheezy served by pgapt [0] ? I generally recommend that to Postgres users, as it supports multiple major versions - independent of their status in testing. But I'm not opposing a wheezy backport of postgis, either. It's known working on wheezy, so feel free... Regards Markus Wanner [0]: pgapt, the PGDG apt repository: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Apt signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: postgis backport for wheezy
On 04/02/2014 07:28 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 04/02/2014 03:28 PM, William Dauchy wrote: >> I was wondering if a backport for wheezy was planned for the >> package postgis? We already maintain several versions in the pgapt repository, among them wheezy. That repo includes support for multiple Postgres major versions. Please consider using that. If somebody wants to provide a backport, that should be relatively straight forward, given that pgapt builds from the same sources as what's in Debian. You'd have to check the geos and gdal dependencies, though - I think pgapt comes with updates for those on wheezy. > I'm not aware of any backport plans, but maybe Markus (CC'ed) can shed > some light on his plans for PostGIS. Bas, thanks for the heads-up. Regards Markus Wanner signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
Re: postgis backport for wheezy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 04/02/2014 03:28 PM, William Dauchy wrote: > I was wondering if a backport for wheezy was planned for the > package postgis? I'm not aware of any backport plans, but maybe Markus (CC'ed) can shed some light on his plans for PostGIS. In general none of the Debian GIS packages are backported, but we've talked about a couple of times without anything concrete coming out of it. If you'd like to help maintain a backport that's the best way to make it happen. Kind Regards, Bas - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTPEi/AAoJEGdQ8QrojUrx5iMP/jmV73G9B3nWMqiU6FGfVbay cpuGwWU+CurJPAGY0M9yoOx0kcW1XYQWs0yONGVnC7Y1I05HgF7mZp/5IUJkNaFu EKnJxDvR9LirxmyqH37tKmn1R4q2TJ4VN8X09gX0DYC6WrG1p/qr/YYZNUlJ6ssO wbWyxUOzd3HBfdST6WDUvyjs+EwzHDU2JY8Mik9c7G3xe2GBdd8wyG+yxEIX8+1W RNX+uiZVvEHXwOvbJB3UwQsESpUIc3RMveOIayQcqagR30tp8V289Syzbbxs4uzJ z529i8OrTXBi8Va4MKdjsr7VwCQUBrnDNfajBcYjZIRhWktD3WAnRliwuZwB8E1G bUiJsGcgVxgPDUZAUuMXM9iw9JRjOHTxJfjnCKWwvELiTOA+4gJ7rprdvaJoru3s Z+HJeGBcsnHfZb5wmuPZEo8+0vgi5/XcKFftfARhmqcM4iHl2t/W51We2e8//udH pnsID+KVA3ohx/tuSe45DDiUhcbrjRUJfQKgw/0uS79Y8+FunXp/h5PIyT1VEkiv lLwJbIPiGcxeHXkIQ3IqxCCXDH+Y7opZ76iz0BHZtlDH4o6jWHgl8w/BX1huExVK RZTuJxnwmpmiZ8EoSU0Z/zKttcSgXF+AWJFFTm7tx17iD+IkxWkRva4lWmiBUrT6 vPBgQFRC+w01qF3PD2bc =rOfg -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Pkg-grass-devel mailing list Pkg-grass-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-devel
