Your message dated Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:04:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#870248: fixed in pandoc 1.19.2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #870248,
regarding pandoc: Collision for lang-Variable when using specific language for
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 12:33:19 -0400
Source: pandoc
Binary: pandoc pandoc-data libghc-pandoc-dev libghc-pandoc-doc
libghc-pandoc-prof
Architecture: source
Version: 1.19.2.1.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
pandoc_1.19.2.1.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pandoc_1.19.2.1.0-1.dsc
pandoc_1.19.2.1.0.orig.tar.gz
pandoc_1.19.2.1.0-1.debian.tar.xz
pandoc_1.19.2.1.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:58:21 -0400
Source: haskell-skylighting
Binary: libghc-skylighting-dev libghc-skylighting-prof libghc-skylighting-doc
skylighting
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Hi Claus-Michael,
Quoting c...@dock.in-berlin.de (2017-07-31 05:26:54)
> it seems that both Babel and pandoc-citeproc use `lang` as a variable
> to set the language, but they don't use the same language codes, e.g.
> for german: ngerman (Babel) and de-DE (pandoc-citeproc), so when using
>
haskell-skylighting_0.3.3.1-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
haskell-skylighting_0.3.3.1-1.dsc
haskell-skylighting_0.3.3.1.orig.tar.gz
haskell-skylighting_0.3.3.1-1.debian.tar.xz
haskell-skylighting_0.3.3.1-1_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:44:54PM -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Can we please have a newer release of Skylighting in Debian?
There you go. I guess you're going to patch pandoc 1.19.2.1 to
work with it?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Bonjour cher
J'ai une proposition d'affaires qui sera avantageuse pour nous deux, et je vous
indemniserai avec le pourcentage à la conclusion finale. Si vous êtes intéressé
s'il vous plaît me répondre en arrière afin de vous fournir plus de détails sur
la façon dont nous pouvons procéder plus