Hello,
Samuel Thibault, on lun. 11 sept. 2017 10:02:12 +0200, wrote:
> In case you have not noticed, the haskell-vector fails the tests on i386
> ports (at least i386 and hurd-i386 failed, kfreebsd-i386 hasn't tried
> yet).
This is confirmed on kfreebsd
Source: haskell-vector
Version: 0.12.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
In case you have not noticed, the haskell-vector fails the tests on i386
ports (at least i386 and hurd-i386 failed, kfreebsd-i386 hasn't tried
yet).
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
Source: ghc
Version: 8.0.2-5
Severity: important
Hello,
As https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-skylighting
shows, haskell-skylighting fails to build on a lot of architectures,
from getting out of memory. I have indeed observed the RSS to be going
very high during the build, mor
Source: haskell-tls
Version: 1.3.10-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
haskell-tls FTBFS:
hlibrary.setup: Encountered missing dependencies:
QuickCheck -any, tasty -any, tasty-quickcheck -any
I guess a missing build-dependency?
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
A
Source: haskell-yaml
Version: 0.8.23-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
haskell-yaml currently FTBFS:
hlibrary.setup: Encountered missing dependencies:
HUnit -any, hspec >=1.3, mockery -any
I guess some missing build dependencies?
Samuel
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
APT prefers testing
Control: reassign -1 libdpkg-perl
Hello,
Guillem Jover, on Thu 10 Nov 2016 06:41:22 +0100, wrote:
> Ok, could you try the following patch for the specs files?
Yep, it fixes the issue, thanks!
Thus reassigning to libdpkg-perl.
> > I'm however surprised that dpkg adds -pie on hurd-i386 too: AIUI
Hello,
Clint Adams, on Wed 09 Nov 2016 17:08:23 +, wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:47:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > It seems the latest ghc has troubles building packages on hurd-i386:
> >
> > [ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
&g
Source: ghc
Version: 8.0.1-11
Severity: important
Hello,
It seems the latest ghc has troubles building packages on hurd-i386:
[ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.hs, dist-ghc/build/Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.o )
...
[18 of 18] Compiling Data.Stream
Source: haskell-hspec
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
Just in case you didn't notice: haskell-hspec is currently not building
on buildds because it build-depends on libghc-hspec-discover-dev (>=
2.2.2) which doesn't exist: at best there is src:haskell-hspec-discover
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 21 Dec 2015 13:31:57 +0100, wrote:
> seems to be fixed by upstream:
> http://hdiff.luite.com/cgit/warp/commit/?id=52d8190a8860045ce9abdc360ee27d792cb073dc
>
> We can upgrade or backport the fix, but given that a transition to
> testing is immanent, I’d wait for that.
Ok,
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 3.1.3.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: hurd
Hello,
haskell-warp currently FTBFS on !linux, they all get:
Network/Wai/Handler/Warp/FdCache.hs:29:8:
Could not find module `Data.Hashable'
It is a member of the hidden package
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 15 Dec 2015 00:53:48 +0100, wrote:
> Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> > I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures
> > that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths
> > diff
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 16:43:22 +0100, wrote:
> I don’t know off-hand by what mechanism the build system ensures
> that these are found, but I’d bet on rpath. Does hurd handle rpaths
> differently?
It does support rpath. ghc apparently uses $ORIGIN in rpath. IIRC we
added some supp
Joachim Breitner, on Mon 14 Dec 2015 15:50:27 +0100, wrote:
> Maybe the haddock executable is broken on hurd? What happens if you install
> ghc and run haddock --interface-version?
I get 27
Samuel
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-m
Source: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-4
Severity: important
On the hurd-i386 port, the ghc package has
Provides: ghc-dynamic, ghc-ghci, ghc-haddock, haddock,
haddock-interface-, etc.
while on other ports, it provides haddock-interface-27. I don't know
how this is supposed to be computed, but it seems tha
15 matches
Mail list logo
