Package: haskell-protobuf
Version: 0.2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
https://github.com/alphaHeavy/protobuf/issues/35
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
Source: haskell-language-python
Version: 0.5.4-5
Severity: serious
https://github.com/bjpop/language-python/issues/39
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Source: haskell-uulib
Version: 0.9.20-5
Severity: serious
Doesn't build with GHC 8.2.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainer
Source: haskell-token-bucket
Version: 0.1.0.1-5
Severity: serious
.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
Source: haskell-gloss-rendering
Version: 1.11.1.1-2
Severity: serious
https://github.com/Teaspot-Studio/gloss-rendering/issues/1
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 04:21:31PM +0100, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> pkg-haskell-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got either no reply,
> or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> new system an
Did you also remove $HOME/.ghc ?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:12:31AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 15427: file=libHSterminfo-0.4.0.2-ghc8.0.2.so [0]; needed by
> /usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc-pkg [0]
objdump -p /usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc-pkg | grep RUNPATH
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers
Control: reassign -1 c2hs
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:05:24PM +0100, Markus Ongyerth wrote:
> I'm a dumbo. This should be on c2hs not cpphs.
> And then the relevant upstream fix is:
> https://github.com/haskell/c2hs/commit/e5b1d84682a3f80721cc57e654feef6287cada36#diff-898d7d64ce63bc38886a61f03411d8
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> I prefer to use update-alternatives.
>
> What do you think Clint?
I haven't looked at the different implementations but
alternatives sounds like the right answer to me.
___
Pkg-haskell-main
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Sacha Delanoue wrote:
> I tried to install libghc-xmonad-contrib-dev by doing
> `apt install libghc-xmonad-contrib-dev` on an up-to-date 9.1 Debian.
> The install failed with the following information:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:15:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Is there any reason why hkt should try to use something in the GnuPG
> homedir?
No, there is no such reason.
> Shouldn't hkt prefer an explicitly-named OpenPGP keyring instead? GnuPG
> upstream generally doesn't want users po
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:47:29AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I don't see any extern references to progname in the libbibutils (4.12)
> source, fwiw.
That's because I still had 5.6 residue on my system, sorry.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:44:54PM -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Can we please have a newer release of Skylighting in Debian?
There you go. I guess you're going to patch pandoc 1.19.2.1 to
work with it?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-h
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:45:22AM -0500, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-skylighting
> shows, haskell-skylighting fails to build on a lot of architectures,
> from getting out of memory. I have indeed observed the RSS to be going
> very
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:22:33PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> It looks like the xcffib dependency from cairocffi is optional, so this
> would be a much easier solution. Otherwise we have to backport tons of
> stuff or use upstream 0.5.1.
So does this mean this is no longer a bug?
_
Because hkt tries to open ~/.gnupg/pubring.gpg which does not exist, hkt
> fails with the following error:
>
> amnesia@amnesia:~$ hkt export-pubkeys 0x9BB25A1A5C1D9108
> hkt (hopenpgp-tools) 0.19.4
> Copyright (C) 2012-2016 Clint Adams
> hkt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. This
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 08:57:22AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > $ sbuild
> > debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk: No such file or
> > directory
> > make: *** No rule to make target '/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk'.
> > Stop.
> > E: Failed to clean source directory
>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:28:59PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I ran
>
> % sbuild -d experimental --build-dep-resolver=aptitude
> --add-depends="libbibutils-dev (>=6.0)" haskell-hs-bibutils_5.5-5.dsc
>
> The build doesn't get very far
>
> ,
> | Running debian/hlibrary.setup build --buildd
John, chell-quickcheck needs patching for QuickCheck 2.9
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:01:23PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: haskell-chell-quickcheck2
> Version: 0.2.5-7
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-chell-quickcheck2&suite=sid
>
> ...
> Prepro
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 03:34:35AM +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
> haskell-yaml FTBFS on every architecture (except all) due to testsuite
> failures:
>
> > Failures:
> >
> > test/Data/YamlSpec.hs:440:
> > 1) Data.Yaml.Data.Yaml encode invalid numbers
> >expected: ".\n"
> > b
Control: reassign -1 libghc-cabal-dev
Control: found -1 1.24.2.0-1
haskell-cabal should be kept out of testing for the foreseeable future,
and any packages build-depending on it should be switched to use ghc's
Cabal for the foreseeable future.
___
Pkg-h
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:24:26AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It apparently then led to memory corruption, since git-annex created
> some very bogus symlinks:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 user user 338 Jun 17 22:36
> bup.git/objects/pack/pack-47b493a3bbbd22200d2b390c277e49ce713243cc.pack ->
> *??:?;J
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:34:05PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote:
> reassign ghc
>
> After some further debug, I found this is, in fact, a ghc bug and it was
> fixed in version 8.0.2, as showed in:
>
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12621
Great!
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:06:32AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > > [ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
> > > Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.hs,
> > > dist-ghc/build/Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.o )
> > > ...
> > > [18 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Text ( Data/Streaming/Tex
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:47:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It seems the latest ghc has troubles building packages on hurd-i386:
>
> [ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
> Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.hs,
> dist-ghc/build/Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.o )
> ...
> [18 of 18]
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 07:26:49PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> In the latter build, I tried the gcc options that allow haskell-src-exts
> to build but this also failed.
>
> Package appears to need more than 4G of VM to build.
What do you suggest?
___
Source: haskell-intern
Version: 0.9.1.4-1
Severity: serious
libghc-intern-doc needs to be rebuilt with ghc 8 so it can become
installable.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
Source: haskell-swish
Version: 0.9.1.7-2
Severity: serious
libghc-swish-doc needs to be rebuilt against ghc 8 so it
can become installable.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debi
Package: libghc-lambdabot-haskell-plugins-dev
Version: 5.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: forwarded -1 https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12790
Number of terms skyrockets during Simplify, probable GHC bug.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg
Package: libghc-wreq-dev
Version: 0.4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
wreq needs patching for ghc 8
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-main
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would think so, yes.
FYI,
https://github.com/haskell-crypto/cryptonite/issues/108#issuecomment-256877591
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.d
Package: libghc-fail-dev
Version: 4.9.0.0-1
Severity: serious
fail 4.9.0.0 should not be released with ghc 8.0 in stretch
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mai
Source: haskell-cabal
Version: 1.22.8.0-1
Severity: serious
stretch should be released either without the haskell-cabal package
or with a newer version than is shipped with ghc
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.aliot
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:03:59PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> | Running ln -rs -T
> debian/libghc-shake-doc/usr/share/doc/libghc-shake-doc/html/CHANGES.txt
> debian/libghc-shake-doc/usr/share/doc/libghc-shake-doc/html/shake.txt
> debian/libghc-shake-doc/usr/lib/ghc-doc/hoogle/libghc-shake-
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:49:13AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
Why is this going to NEW?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debi
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:01:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> In Ubuntu, we've observed a build failure of haskell-cryptonite on armhf
> owing to the fact that our armhf builders run on an arm64 kernel which
> raises SIGBUS on unaligned access. While most of the hash implementations
> have com
Control: severity 712228 serious
In theory this is fixed with 8.0.1-6, but who knows?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainer
Source: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-9
Severity: serious
clint@abel ~/haskell-http-api-data-0.2.4
% ghci -isrc -XCPP -D"MIN_VERSION_base(X,Y,Z)=1"
GHCi, version 7.10.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Prelude> :l src/Web/HttpApiData.hs
[1 of 2] Compiling Web.HttpApiData.Internal ( src/Web/HttpApi
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> So passing -mxgot would be worth a try. This seems to be similar to
> the -fpic/-fPIC distinction.
That appears to do the trick.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-main
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 01:44:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If instead - as I suspect - the tool works perfectly fine with Latin1
> and other scripts, and is not hardcoded to render its output using that
> particular font, then please relax to only suggest fonts-noto-cjk.
It is hardcoded t
Package: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-9
Control: forwarded -1 https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12642
ghc --info reports ArchMipseb on mips64el.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.de
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:14:35AM -0400, Jonathan Jackson wrote:
> The last build of haskell-src-exts 1.17.1-1 has failed 30 days
> ago on a mips64el device. More information since first report
> of this failure have been acquired. Bug report seems to
> indicate that there is a linker problem d
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40:07AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> It might be possible to force gcc to do more frequent garbage collection at
> the expense of compile time. Changing
> optimizations might help. Maybe program could be restructured...
Got a patch in mind?
__
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:51:01AM +, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> hokey dies with the error below.
>
> hkt export-pubkeys 056E61A6F3B6C9323049DBF9565EE9641503F0AA | hokey lint
> hokey (hopenpgp-tools) 0.13
> Copyright (C) 2012-2014 Clint Adams
> hokey comes with ABSO
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:32:59AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> A bit wishlist style suggestion.
> I maintain a package that I created manpages from --help output by
> using "help2man" command.
> You can take a look at it:
> - https://github.com/rogers0/libcorkipset/blob/debian/debian/rules
Thank
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:44:25AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> : can't load .so/.DLL for:
> /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-7.10.3/pandoc-citeproc-0.9.1.1-H4nKjmy3LdhAeupsyJYDB0/libHSpandoc-citeproc-0.9.1.1-H4nKjmy3LdhAeupsyJYDB0-ghc7.10.3.so
> (libicuuc.so.55: cannot open s
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:07:47PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Thanks for the catch and the --pw-file hint. Unfortunately, stable's
> hdav does not have --password-file, and neither does 1.2 in
> unstable, it seems.
1.3 (not in Debian) has interactive password prompting. Presumably
you could
severity 819890 important
quit
This has been worked around by disabling the doctests. Whatever is
broken on armel is still broken, but that is irrelevant to the testing
migration held up by this bug.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:53:09PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> * authentication-capable subkeys that have no embedded cross
>certification should probably have a yellow alert.
Are there examples of authentication-capable subkeys with embedded cross-certs
in the wild?
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:24:38AM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> The reproducible-builds is armhf while the failing ones are armel. The
> regression
> appears to be a code change in haskell-http2 between 1.0.4 and 1.3.1:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-http2&arch=armel
I
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:31:51PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> werewolf-test: unknown RTS option: -N
> werewolf-test:
> werewolf-test: Usage: [+RTS | -RTS ] ...
> --RTS
> Test suite werewolf-test: FAIL
> Test suite logged to: dist-ghc/test/werewolf-0.5.1.0-werewolf-test.log
> 0 o
52 matches
Mail list logo
