Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon, Jan 08 2018, Félix Sipma wrote: > Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be > to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features > pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? Yes, this is what should be done, rather than updating individual

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Félix Sipma
09:46:44) >> a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: >> do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? > > Excellent question. > > For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: > > * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Philipp, Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) > a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: > do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? Excellent question. For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: * texmath >= 0.10

pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Philipp Huebner
Hello haskell maintainers, a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? (Please keep me cc'ed, I'm not subscribed to the list.) Best wishes, -- .''`. Philipp Huebner <debala...@debian.org> : :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8C