pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Philipp Huebner
Hello haskell maintainers, a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? (Please keep me cc'ed, I'm not subscribed to the list.) Best wishes, -- .''`. Philipp Huebner : :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A

tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian status changes for haskell-transformers-compat

2018-01-08 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2018-01-08 17:47 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-transformers-compat changed from reproducible -> FTBFS ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian status changes for haskell-xss-sanitize

2018-01-08 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2018-01-08 17:48 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-xss-sanitize changed from reproducible -> FTBFS ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian status changes for haskell-tf-random

2018-01-08 Thread Reproducible builds folks
2018-01-08 17:44 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-tf-random changed from reproducible -> FTBFS ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Félix Sipma
Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? On 2018-01-08 11:30+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) >> a

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Philipp, Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) > a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: > do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? Excellent question. For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon, Jan 08 2018, Félix Sipma wrote: > Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be > to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features > pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? Yes, this is what should be done, rather than updating individual