Hello haskell maintainers,
a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc:
do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ?
(Please keep me cc'ed, I'm not subscribed to the list.)
Best wishes,
--
.''`. Philipp Huebner
: :' : pgp fp: 6719 25C5 B8CD E74A
2018-01-08 17:47
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-transformers-compat
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
2018-01-08 17:48
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-xss-sanitize
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
2018-01-08 17:44
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/haskell-tf-random
changed from reproducible -> FTBFS
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be to upgrade
the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a
way to help there?
On 2018-01-08 11:30+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44)
>> a
Hi Philipp,
Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44)
> a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc:
> do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ?
Excellent question.
For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries:
* texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 08 2018, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be
> to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features
> pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there?
Yes, this is what should be done, rather than updating individual