On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:24:38AM +, Riku Voipio wrote:
> The reproducible-builds is armhf while the failing ones are armel. The
> regression
> appears to be a code change in haskell-http2 between 1.0.4 and 1.3.1:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-http2=armel
I
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:31:51PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> werewolf-test: unknown RTS option: -N
> werewolf-test:
> werewolf-test: Usage: [+RTS | -RTS ] ...
> --RTS
> Test suite werewolf-test: FAIL
> Test suite logged to: dist-ghc/test/werewolf-0.5.1.0-werewolf-test.log
> 0
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:53:09PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> * authentication-capable subkeys that have no embedded cross
>certification should probably have a yellow alert.
Are there examples of authentication-capable subkeys with embedded cross-certs
in the wild?
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 07:44:25AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> : can't load .so/.DLL for:
> /usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc/lib/x86_64-linux-ghc-7.10.3/pandoc-citeproc-0.9.1.1-H4nKjmy3LdhAeupsyJYDB0/libHSpandoc-citeproc-0.9.1.1-H4nKjmy3LdhAeupsyJYDB0-ghc7.10.3.so
> (libicuuc.so.55: cannot open
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 11:32:59AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> A bit wishlist style suggestion.
> I maintain a package that I created manpages from --help output by
> using "help2man" command.
> You can take a look at it:
> - https://github.com/rogers0/libcorkipset/blob/debian/debian/rules
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:51:01AM +, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> hokey dies with the error below.
>
> hkt export-pubkeys 056E61A6F3B6C9323049DBF9565EE9641503F0AA | hokey lint
> hokey (hopenpgp-tools) 0.13
> Copyright (C) 2012-2014 Clint Adams
> hokey comes with ABSO
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:07:47PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Thanks for the catch and the --pw-file hint. Unfortunately, stable's
> hdav does not have --password-file, and neither does 1.2 in
> unstable, it seems.
1.3 (not in Debian) has interactive password prompting. Presumably
you could
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:40:07AM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> It might be possible to force gcc to do more frequent garbage collection at
> the expense of compile time. Changing
> optimizations might help. Maybe program could be restructured...
Got a patch in mind?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:14:35AM -0400, Jonathan Jackson wrote:
> The last build of haskell-src-exts 1.17.1-1 has failed 30 days
> ago on a mips64el device. More information since first report
> of this failure have been acquired. Bug report seems to
> indicate that there is a linker problem
Package: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-9
Control: forwarded -1 https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12642
ghc --info reports ArchMipseb on mips64el.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-9
Severity: serious
clint@abel ~/haskell-http-api-data-0.2.4
% ghci -isrc -XCPP -D"MIN_VERSION_base(X,Y,Z)=1"
GHCi, version 7.10.3: http://www.haskell.org/ghc/ :? for help
Prelude> :l src/Web/HttpApiData.hs
[1 of 2] Compiling Web.HttpApiData.Internal (
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 01:44:34PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> If instead - as I suspect - the tool works perfectly fine with Latin1
> and other scripts, and is not hardcoded to render its output using that
> particular font, then please relax to only suggest fonts-noto-cjk.
It is hardcoded
On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> So passing -mxgot would be worth a try. This seems to be similar to
> the -fpic/-fPIC distinction.
That appears to do the trick.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:03:59PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> | Running ln -rs -T
> debian/libghc-shake-doc/usr/share/doc/libghc-shake-doc/html/CHANGES.txt
> debian/libghc-shake-doc/usr/share/doc/libghc-shake-doc/html/shake.txt
>
Package: libghc-fail-dev
Version: 4.9.0.0-1
Severity: serious
fail 4.9.0.0 should not be released with ghc 8.0 in stretch
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: haskell-cabal
Version: 1.22.8.0-1
Severity: serious
stretch should be released either without the haskell-cabal package
or with a newer version than is shipped with ghc
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:14:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would think so, yes.
FYI,
https://github.com/haskell-crypto/cryptonite/issues/108#issuecomment-256877591
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Package: libghc-wreq-dev
Version: 0.4.1.0-1
Severity: serious
wreq needs patching for ghc 8
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: haskell-intern
Version: 0.9.1.4-1
Severity: serious
libghc-intern-doc needs to be rebuilt with ghc 8 so it can become
installable.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: haskell-swish
Version: 0.9.1.7-2
Severity: serious
libghc-swish-doc needs to be rebuilt against ghc 8 so it
can become installable.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 07:26:49PM -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
> In the latter build, I tried the gcc options that allow haskell-src-exts
> to build but this also failed.
>
> Package appears to need more than 4G of VM to build.
What do you suggest?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:06:32AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > > [ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
> > > Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.hs,
> > > dist-ghc/build/Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.o )
> > > ...
> > > [18 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Text (
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:47:13PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It seems the latest ghc has troubles building packages on hurd-i386:
>
> [ 1 of 18] Compiling Data.Streaming.Zlib.Lowlevel (
> Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.hs,
> dist-ghc/build/Data/Streaming/Zlib/Lowlevel.o )
> ...
> [18 of 18]
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 05:01:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> In Ubuntu, we've observed a build failure of haskell-cryptonite on armhf
> owing to the fact that our armhf builders run on an arm64 kernel which
> raises SIGBUS on unaligned access. While most of the hash implementations
> have
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:49:13AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.
Why is this going to NEW?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: severity 712228 serious
In theory this is fixed with 8.0.1-6, but who knows?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 01:34:05PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote:
> reassign ghc
>
> After some further debug, I found this is, in fact, a ghc bug and it was
> fixed in version 8.0.2, as showed in:
>
> https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12621
Great!
Package: libghc-lambdabot-haskell-plugins-dev
Version: 5.1-2
Severity: serious
Control: forwarded -1 https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12790
Number of terms skyrockets during Simplify, probable GHC bug.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:24:26AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> It apparently then led to memory corruption, since git-annex created
> some very bogus symlinks:
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 user user 338 Jun 17 22:36
> bup.git/objects/pack/pack-47b493a3bbbd22200d2b390c277e49ce713243cc.pack ->
>
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:28:59PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I ran
>
> % sbuild -d experimental --build-dep-resolver=aptitude
> --add-depends="libbibutils-dev (>=6.0)" haskell-hs-bibutils_5.5-5.dsc
>
> The build doesn't get very far
>
> ,
> | Running debian/hlibrary.setup build
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 08:57:22AM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > $ sbuild
> > debian/rules:4: /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk: No such file or
> > directory
> > make: *** No rule to make target '/usr/share/cdbs/1/class/hlibrary.mk'.
> > Stop.
> > E: Failed to clean source directory
>
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 10:45:22AM -0500, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-skylighting
> shows, haskell-skylighting fails to build on a lot of architectures,
> from getting out of memory. I have indeed observed the RSS to be going
>
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 01:22:33PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> It looks like the xcffib dependency from cairocffi is optional, so this
> would be a much easier solution. Otherwise we have to backport tons of
> stuff or use upstream 0.5.1.
So does this mean this is no longer a bug?
John, chell-quickcheck needs patching for QuickCheck 2.9
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 09:01:23PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: haskell-chell-quickcheck2
> Version: 0.2.5-7
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-chell-quickcheck2=sid
>
> ...
>
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 05:44:54PM -0400, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Can we please have a newer release of Skylighting in Debian?
There you go. I guess you're going to patch pandoc 1.19.2.1 to
work with it?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Control: reassign -1 libghc-cabal-dev
Control: found -1 1.24.2.0-1
haskell-cabal should be kept out of testing for the foreseeable future,
and any packages build-depending on it should be switched to use ghc's
Cabal for the foreseeable future.
___
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 03:34:35AM +0100, James Clarke wrote:
> Hi,
> haskell-yaml FTBFS on every architecture (except all) due to testsuite
> failures:
>
> > Failures:
> >
> > test/Data/YamlSpec.hs:440:
> > 1) Data.Yaml.Data.Yaml encode invalid numbers
> >expected: ".\n"
> >
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:16:13AM +0200, Sacha Delanoue wrote:
> I tried to install libghc-xmonad-contrib-dev by doing
> `apt install libghc-xmonad-contrib-dev` on an up-to-date 9.1 Debian.
> The install failed with the following information:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:15:22PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Is there any reason why hkt should try to use something in the GnuPG
> homedir?
No, there is no such reason.
> Shouldn't hkt prefer an explicitly-named OpenPGP keyring instead? GnuPG
> upstream generally doesn't want users
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:47:29AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> I don't see any extern references to progname in the libbibutils (4.12)
> source, fwiw.
That's because I still had 5.6 residue on my system, sorry.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:12:31AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 15427: file=libHSterminfo-0.4.0.2-ghc8.0.2.so [0]; needed by
> /usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc-pkg [0]
objdump -p /usr/lib/ghc/bin/ghc-pkg | grep RUNPATH
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:48:12PM +0100, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> I prefer to use update-alternatives.
>
> What do you think Clint?
I haven't looked at the different implementations but
alternatives sounds like the right answer to me.
___
Control: reassign -1 c2hs
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 05:05:24PM +0100, Markus Ongyerth wrote:
> I'm a dumbo. This should be on c2hs not cpphs.
> And then the relevant upstream fix is:
>
Source: haskell-gloss-rendering
Version: 1.11.1.1-2
Severity: serious
https://github.com/Teaspot-Studio/gloss-rendering/issues/1
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: haskell-token-bucket
Version: 0.1.0.1-5
Severity: serious
.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
Source: haskell-uulib
Version: 0.9.20-5
Severity: serious
Doesn't build with GHC 8.2.
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Source: haskell-language-python
Version: 0.5.4-5
Severity: serious
https://github.com/bjpop/language-python/issues/39
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Package: haskell-protobuf
Version: 0.2.1.1-3
Severity: serious
https://github.com/alphaHeavy/protobuf/issues/35
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 04:21:31PM +0100, alioth lists migration team wrote:
> We tried to contact the designated list owner via
> pkg-haskell-maintainers-ow...@lists.alioth.debian.org but got either no reply,
> or a bounce message. Accordingly, this list will not be migrated to the
> new system
Did you also remove $HOME/.ghc ?
___
Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
50 matches
Mail list logo
