Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Mon, Jan 08 2018, Félix Sipma wrote: > Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be > to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features > pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? Yes, this is what should be done, rather than updating individual

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Félix Sipma
Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? On 2018-01-08 11:30+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) >> a

Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?

2018-01-08 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi Philipp, Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) > a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: > do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? Excellent question. For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11