Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?
Hello, On Mon, Jan 08 2018, Félix Sipma wrote: > Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be > to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features > pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? Yes, this is what should be done, rather than updating individual libraries. What has to happen first is ghc 8.2 moved experimental->unstable. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?
Instead of updating individual libraries, maybe the easiest would be to upgrade the package set to stackage LTS 10 (which features pandoc-2.0.6). Is there a way to help there? On 2018-01-08 11:30+0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) >> a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: >> do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? > > Excellent question. > > For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: > > * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11 > * pandoc-types >= 1.17.3 && < 1.18 > * skylighting >= 0.5.1 && < 0.6 > * hslua >= 0.9.5 && < 0.10 > > ...and these Haskell libraries now missing needs to be packaged: > > * hslua-module-text >= 0.1.2 && < 0.2 > * cmark-gfm >= 0.1.1 && < 0.2 > > I would appreciate if someone other than me in the team could package > those. Or tell me if problematic, then I can investiate if restrictions > in Pandoc can be relaxed via patches. > > When above is done, I intend to package Pandoc 2.x targeted > experimental, and file bugreports against reverse dependencies to have > them tested for regressions. > > then we can consider if possible to simply have the pandoc package > upgraded to 2.x or we need to introduce a new pandoc2 package (if that > is possible at all - I suspect the dependencies e.g. on pandoc-types may > diverge too much). > > - Jonas signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
Re: pandoc 2.0.X ?
Hi Philipp, Quoting Philipp Huebner (2018-01-08 09:46:44) > a quick question for the uploaders of pandoc: > do you have any plans regarding the packaging of pandoc 2.0.X ? Excellent question. For starters, we will need updates for the following Haskell libraries: * texmath >= 0.10 && < 0.11 * pandoc-types >= 1.17.3 && < 1.18 * skylighting >= 0.5.1 && < 0.6 * hslua >= 0.9.5 && < 0.10 ...and these Haskell libraries now missing needs to be packaged: * hslua-module-text >= 0.1.2 && < 0.2 * cmark-gfm >= 0.1.1 && < 0.2 I would appreciate if someone other than me in the team could package those. Or tell me if problematic, then I can investiate if restrictions in Pandoc can be relaxed via patches. When above is done, I intend to package Pandoc 2.x targeted experimental, and file bugreports against reverse dependencies to have them tested for regressions. then we can consider if possible to simply have the pandoc package upgraded to 2.x or we need to introduce a new pandoc2 package (if that is possible at all - I suspect the dependencies e.g. on pandoc-types may diverge too much). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: signature ___ Pkg-haskell-maintainers mailing list Pkg-haskell-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-haskell-maintainers
