Bug#923185: marked as done (FTBS: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2019 05:34:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923185: fixed in isorelax 2004-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #923185, regarding FTBS: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This means

Bug#919959: marked as done (isorelax: Dangerous use of "find" in debian/rules)

Your message dated Tue, 26 Feb 2019 05:34:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#919959: fixed in isorelax 2004-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #919959, regarding isorelax: Dangerous use of "find" in debian/rules to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

isorelax_20041111-12_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:17:46 -0800 Source: isorelax Architecture: source Version: 2004-12 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: tony mancill Closes: 919959 923185

Processing of isorelax_20041111-12_source.changes

isorelax_2004-12_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: isorelax_2004-12.dsc isorelax_2004-12.debian.tar.xz isorelax_2004-12_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the

Processed: Bug #919959 in isorelax marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #919959 [src:isorelax] isorelax: Dangerous use of "find" in debian/rules Added tag(s) pending. -- 919959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is

sisu-inject 0.3.3-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the sisu-inject source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.3.2-3 Current version: 0.3.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will

jansi 1.17.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the jansi source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.16-1 Current version: 1.17.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

hawtjni 1.16-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the hawtjni source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.15-3 Current version: 1.16-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

Bug#923299: /lib/systemd/system/tomcat9.service: tomcat9 fails to run; "Failed to set up mount namespacing" in system log

Package: tomcat9 Version: 9.0.16-2 Severity: important File: /lib/systemd/system/tomcat9.service Dear Maintainer, A fresh install of tomcat9 results in the daemon failing to run with a cryptic error in syslog: tomcat9.service: Failed to set up mount namespacing: No such file or directory

bridge-method-injector: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 18:35 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/bridge-method-injector changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

bindex: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 02:28 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/bindex changed from reproducible -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

junit4: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 21:27 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/junit4 changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

fop: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-24 15:07 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/fop changed from FTBR -> FTBFS __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for

animal-sniffer: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 18:38 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/animal-sniffer changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

libparanamer-java: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 21:45 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/libparanamer-java changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

felix-gogo-command: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-02-25 20:15 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/felix-gogo-command changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use

Bug#917702: Accepted jruby 9.1.17.0-1 (source) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:38:40 +0100 Source: jruby Binary: jruby Architecture: source Version: 9.1.17.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Description: jruby

Bug#923284: Seemingly miscompiles with jdk-11

Thank you for the report Sjoerd. What error did you get when compiling gradle with the rebuilt bsh? Emmanuel Bourg __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for

Bug#923295: src:jruby-joni: tests fail with invalid character property name

Package: src:jruby-joni Version: 2.1.25-1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream ftbfs Forwarded: https://github.com/jruby/joni/issues/40 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, As you already know, jruby-joni fails build-time tests in the current unstable: SEVERE ERROR:

Processed: Re: jruby: system() does not work on arm64

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 891449 important Bug #891449 [jruby] jruby: system() does not work on arm64 Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 891449:

jruby_9.1.17.0-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:38:40 +0100 Source: jruby Binary: jruby Architecture: source Version: 9.1.17.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Description:

Bug#923284: Seemingly miscompiles with jdk-11

Source: bsh Version: 2.0b4-19 Severity: serious When building bsh with openjdk-11 it seems that afterwards building packages using it fails e.g. after rebuilding bsh gradle fails to build. Attached is a dockerfile which nicely shows the issue -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid

Processing of jruby_9.1.17.0-1_source.changes

jruby_9.1.17.0-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jruby_9.1.17.0-1.dsc jruby_9.1.17.0.orig.tar.gz jruby_9.1.17.0-1.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of

Bug#893244: jruby FTBFS with openjdk-9

Hi Markus, On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > JRuby is a mess. I guess we "just" need to package the latest upstream > release to fix the FTBFS bugs. Nobody felt like doing that in the past > twelve months, so I think it is unrealistic to believe we can make it >

jtreg_4.2-b14-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 12:44:58 +0100 Source: jtreg Architecture: source Version: 4.2-b14-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg Changes: jtreg (4.2-b14-1)

Processing of jtreg_4.2-b14-1_source.changes

jtreg_4.2-b14-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jtreg_4.2-b14-1.dsc jtreg_4.2-b14.orig.tar.gz jtreg_4.2-b14-1.debian.tar.xz jtreg_4.2-b14-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is

Bug#909259: marked as done (procyon: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass() removal)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:04:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#909259: fixed in procyon 0.5.32-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #909259, regarding procyon: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass() removal to be marked as done. This means that you claim

procyon_0.5.32-5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:35:03 +0100 Source: procyon Architecture: source Version: 0.5.32-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg Closes: 909259 Changes:

Processing of procyon_0.5.32-5_source.changes

procyon_0.5.32-5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: procyon_0.5.32-5.dsc procyon_0.5.32-5.debian.tar.xz procyon_0.5.32-5_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address

Processed: Bug #909259 in procyon marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #909259 [src:procyon] procyon: FTBFS with Java 11 due to sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass() removal Added tag(s) pending. -- 909259: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909259 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org